耀斑激波的相互作用

采用一维磁流体力学模型和激波装配法，分析两个相继出现的耀斑激波的相互作用.前导激波下游的稀疏波显著改变后随激波的特性，并在它的下游产生强后向快激波.两耀斑激波汇合后将在下游形成密度比约为1.5的接触间断.     

多重激波的数值模拟研究

本文用一维混合粒子模拟Code研究了包括中间激波在内的多重激波.模拟了四种情形,可以分为两类:(1)由快激波和中间激波构成的两重激波,(2)快激波、中间激波和慢激波构成的三重激波.结果表明:多重激波是不稳定的,它趋向于发展成磁流体旋转间断和MHD波,左旋圆偏振波逐渐在上游区内发展起来.文章对导致多重激波不稳定性的可能原因进行了简单的讨论.     

磁流体斜激波的碰撞

讨论了磁流体斜激波之间的碰撞及其与接触间断的相互作用规律,主要结论如下:(1)两个快激波碰撞后交换位置,同时出现一接触间断和一慢稀疏波对。(2)两个慢激波碰撞后交换位置且强度减弱,同时出现一接触间断和一块激波对。(3)一前向快激波与一后向慢激波碰撞后交换位置,快激波强度增加,慢激波强度减弱,同时出现一后向快激波、一负接触间断和一前向慢稀疏波。(4)一前向快激波与一正(负)接触间断相互作用后交换位置,快激波减弱,同时出现一后向快稀疏波(快激波)、一后向慢激波和一前向慢激波(慢稀疏波).(5)一前向慢激波与一正(负)接触间断相互作用后交换位置,慢激波减弱,同时出现一后向慢稀疏波(慢激波)和一快稀疏波(快激波)对。      

准平行无碰撞激波的混合模拟

本文应用一维混合模拟方法数值研究了准平行无碰撞激波的结构.结果表明,激波上游的质子和准平行无碰撞激波相互作用后,有部分质子被激波反射,并向激波上游运动很长一段距离,从而激发起束流不稳定性,引起大振幅的共振右旋偏振的低频波动.这些波动在太阳风的带动下向激波下游运动,靠近激波后与激波合井,同时在激波的上游不断有新的波动产生.此过程能不断重复地进行.在平行无碰撞激波的情况下,在激波的下游还有大振幅的非共振右旋偏振的低频波动.激波上游的低频波动在向下游运动的过程中强度不断加强,最后超过原来激波的强度,形成新的激波.      

磁流体激波跃变条件的无量纲化

本文通过对磁流体激波跃变方程组的无量纲化处理,得到了有关磁流体激波跃变条件及其解析解的一种普遍化的最简形式;对斜激波、垂直激波、平行激波和气体动力学激波与磁流体力学激波的统一形式均给予了讨论.这些公式对理论研究和工程应用中的实际计算都很方便.      

磁流体斜激波的汇合

本文讨论磁流体快、慢激波的汇合作用规律,主要结论如下:(1)两个前向快激波汇合之后,形成一更强的前向快激波,尾随一前向慢稀疏波、一正接触间断(后侧密度大于前侧)、一后向慢激波和一后向快稀疏浚。(2)两个前向慢激波汇合之后,形成一更强的前向慢激波,尾随一正接触间断、一后向慢稀疏波和一后向快激波2在前向慢激波前方出现一前向快波,它或为稀疏浚(中、小激波角情况),或为激波(大激波角情况).(3)前向快激波会追上前向慢激波而发生汇合,之后互换位置且强度减弱,尾随一正接触间断和一后向稀疏波对。      

利用特征速度讨论磁流体力学激波特性

本文用作者在文[1]中引入的特征速度U_*作为磁流体力学激波的基本强度参数,解析地讨论了磁流体力学激波的种类和特性;详细地讨论了磁场强度跃变比h随特征马赫数平方M_*2=U_*2/C₁2的函数的变化;给出介质密度、压力、法向和切向速度[u_x]/C₁和[u_y]/C₁跃变比的结果,最后,讨论了包括励磁和消磁激波在内的垂直和平行磁流体力学激波的极限情形。      

磁流体中间激波的相互作用

本文讨论磁流体中间激波的相互作用规律．主要结论：中间激波汇合的产物为后向快简单波、后向慢简单波或慢激波、接触间断、前向慢激波和前向快激波，其中后向波成份和接触间断很弱．当左（右）激波较强时，中国激波碰撞产物为后（前）向快激波、后（前）向慢简单波或慢激波、负（正）切向间断、前（后）向慢简单波和前（后）向快激波．     

行星际慢激波的传播和演化

采用二维理想MHD模型，分别在日球赤道面(二维二分量模型)和日球子午面(二维三分量模型)内研究太阳风中慢激波的传播和演化规律．结果表明，慢激波在向外传播的过程中逐渐演化为由原慢激波和新产生的快激波构成的激波系统，该激波系统在子午面内相对慢激波源中心法线基本对称，而在赤道面内则是不对称的：快激波阵面和慢激波阵面之间存在一个切触点，该处两个激波合并，蜕化为气体激波．上述切触点相对激波源中心法线东偏，且东偏角度在激波系统向外传播过程中不断增加．初步分析表明，行星际磁场的螺旋结构是产生日球赤道面内慢激波传播和演化的东西不对称性的主要原因．     

弓激波前内透射离子动力学横场流静电不稳定性

本文讨论了地球弓激波前内背景电子速度分布函数为平顶形式时的透射离子横场流静电不稳定性.结果表明,在超临界(Alfvén Mach数M_A>3)准垂直激波区(激波法向与行星际磁场之间的夹角75°)情况下,透射离子流产生的静电不稳定性增长率峰值要比电子速度为Maxwell分布时更加显著,并满足动力学性质.     

Some characteristics of propagation of flare- or CME-associated interplanetary shock waves

Many interplanetary shock waves have a fast mode MHD wave Mach number between one and two and the ambient solar wind plasma and magnetic field are known to fluctuate. Therefore a weak, fast, MHD interplanetary shock wave propagating into a fluctuating solar wind region or into a solar wind stream will be expected to vary its strength.It is possible that an interplanetary shock wave, upon entering such a region will weaken its strength and degenerate into a fast-mode MHD wave. It is even possible that the shock may dissipate and disappear.A model for the propagation of a solar flare - or CME (Coronal Mass Ejections) - associated interplanetary shock wave is given. A physical mechanism is described to calculate the probability that a weak shock which enters a turbulent solar wind region will degenerate into a MHD wave. That is, the shock would disappear as an entropy-generate entity. This model also suggests that most interplanetary shock waves cannot propagate continuously with a smooth shock surface. It is suggested that the surface of an interplanetary shock will be highly distorted and that parts of the shock surface can degenerate into MHD waves or even disappear during its global propagation through interplanetary space. A few observations to support this model will be briefly described.Finally, this model of shock propagation also applies to corotating shocks. As corotating shocks propagate into fluctuating ambient solar wind regions, shocks may degenerate into waves or disappear.     

一种确定模拟的行星际MHD激波局地参数的新方法

简要阐述了分析模拟的行星际磁流体力学（MHD）激波的局部性质时，采用无厚度局部平面激波这一假设的合理性，说明了在激波未扰动区域（激波上游），物理量在几个小时内的变化很小这一事实，利用平面激波的分析方法，提出了分析模拟的行星际MHD激波的新方法，包括激波位置的确定，上下游状态参数的选择，激波局部参数的计算以及激波的分类，最后应用这种方法对一个二维的MHD模拟结果进行了分析。结果证实了过去文献关于磁流体力学混合激波空间连接和时间演化的链式规则，而且说明位于太阳赤道附近的慢激波和中间激波最终会发展为快激波。     

Propagation of interplanetary shocks into the Earth’s magnetosphere

This paper is devoted to the study of propagation of disturbances caused by interplanetary shocks (IPS) through the Earth’s magnetosphere. Using simultaneous observations of various fast forward shocks by different satellites in the solar wind, magnetosheath and magnetosphere from 1995 till 2002, we traced the interplanetary shocks into the Earth’s magnetosphere, we calculated the velocity of their propagation into the Earth’s magnetosphere and analyzed fronts of the disturbances. From the onset of disturbances at different satellites in the magnetosphere we obtained speed values ranging from 500 to 1300 km/s in the direction along the IP shock normal, that is in a general agreement with results of previous numerical MHD simulations. The paper discusses in detail a sequence of two events on November 9th, 2002. For the two cases we estimated the propagation speed of the IP shock caused disturbance between the dayside and nightside magnetosphere to be 590 km/s and 714–741 km/s, respectively. We partially attributed this increase to higher Alfven speed in the outer magnetosphere due to the compression of the magnetosphere as a consequence of the first event, and partially to the faster and stronger driving interplanetary shock. High-time resolution GOES magnetic field data revealed a complex structure of the compressional wave fronts at the dayside geosynchronous orbit during these events, with initial very steep parts (10 s). We discuss a few possible mechanisms of such steep front formation in the paper.     

Structure and kinetic properties of slow-mode shocks associated with magnetic reconnection in the near-Earth magnetotail

We study the structure and kinetic properties of slow-mode shocks near the plasma sheet boundary layer (PSBL) associated with magnetic reconnection by Cluster observation. The presence of slow-mode shocks is confirmed by traditional Rankine–Hugoniot (RH) analysis and Monte-Carlo shock fitting method. The Walén analysis, applied to the tailward flow associated with slow-mode shocks, also supports that plasma was accelerated across a Petschek-type slow-mode shock connected to the diffusion region. Back-streaming ions were observed on the shock layer, and cold ions were accelerated and heated by slow-mode shocks. In addition, whistler and electrostatic solitary waves were observed around the slow-mode shocks. These waves might be excited by the observed field-aligned electron beams near the shocks.