美俄天基反卫星技术的发展

分析介绍了前苏联(俄罗斯)反卫星系统的发展历程和美国反卫星技术的发展现状,并对反卫星武器的发展趋势进行了初步探讨。     

美苏加快发展反卫星武器

本文介绍了美苏反卫星武器的发展计划,并评述了反卫星技术取得的新进展。     

反卫星武器发展的相关问题研究

随着卫星在现代战争中的作用日益增强,空间已成为各国新的战略制高点.介绍了反卫星武器系统的概念及结构,并对未来反卫星武器的发展建设从技术角度进行了分析与研究,最后对当前发展反卫星武器面临的问题进行了深入的剖析.     

小卫星编队与反卫星卫星

反卫星卫星几乎是跟卫星同步发展起来的,俄罗斯既是最早发展卫星技术的国家,也是最早发展反卫星卫星技术的国家。上世纪90年代以后,随着小卫星的出现而发展起来了小卫星编队。小卫星编队的目的是用编队分布式概念来实现通信、侦察和导航等任务,进而用若干个小卫星虚拟一个大卫星。小卫星编队和反卫星卫星产生于不同时代和不同目的,本来是不相干的问题,却出现了巧合。笔者认为,反卫星卫星是小卫星编队的一种特殊应用,小卫星编队的关键技术是反卫星卫星技术的基础,可以说,掌握小卫星编队技术的国家,就具备了反卫星卫星的能力。     

机载反卫星武器的发展与展望

主要探讨空间作战中的空基平台武器装备的研制与发展问题。从分析新世纪战争中空间作战的军事需求入手，进而讨论了空间作战武器平台与武器装备的发展问题，回顾了机载反卫星导弹的研制与发展历程，探讨了反卫星导弹的关键技术。针对机载反卫星导弹的未来发展提出了看法。     

国外天基反卫星技术的发展

分析了前苏联(俄罗斯)和美国反卫星系统的发展历程和现状,并对反卫星武器的发展趋势和关键技术进行了初步探讨。     

空天信息支持反卫星作战军事概念模型

以空天信息支持反卫星作战为基础,分析了反卫星作战的工作过程,综合采用形式化概念建模语言,重点建立了空天信息支持反卫星作战的军事概念模型,为建立数学模型、逻辑模型提供足够完备和详尽的信息,为模型的验证提供可追踪的参照.     

美国发展反卫星武器浅析

美国新的国家空间政策强调要控制宇宙空间。为确保美军控制空间的战略和空间军事力量的绝对优势，并防止潜在对手利用空间，反卫星武器日益受到重视。多年来，美国冒着违反国际公约的风险，研制天基和地基反卫星武器。该文着重介绍美国反卫星武器及其试验情况，最后对美国的反卫星武器做了简要评估。     

美国的空间对抗装备技术(下)

3.机载动能反卫星系统1976年美国空军开始发展由F-15战斗机携带的空射型直接上升式动能反卫星武器。在由F-15发射后,寻的拦截器与发动机分离,通过长波红外探测器     

美国反卫星武器技术发展途径与进展

美国政府2006年10月公布的新版<国家航天政策>强调,美国要不受阻碍地在空间或通过空间开展操作以及"拒止敌方利用与美国国家利益相抵触的空间能力".这一政策隐含了发展和在必要时使用包括反卫星武器在内的空间对抗武器的内容,为美国继续发展反卫星武器技术提供了政策依据.     

浅析MD系统的卫星攻击能力

从美军海基导弹防御系统击落报废间谍卫星这一事件出发,分析了美国正在部署的导弹防御系统（MD）的反卫能力,包括地基导弹防御系统、海基导弹防御系统、机栽激光防御系统、天基导弹防御系统所具有的对各种卫星的潜在攻击能力。     

Towards an effective and adequately verifiable PPWT

The 2008 Russia–China proposal to the Conference on Disarmament on preventing space weapons has attracted wide attention. Lengthy debates have been made on the need for such a treaty and for two of its most disputed elements, namely prohibition of ground-based anti-satellite weapons and verification. This article argues that, regardless of verifiability, such a treaty is urgently needed for the benefit of international peace and security, and for the security interests of spacefaring countries. But in order to serve these purposes effectively, the treaty should at least explicitly prohibit testing, deployment and use of space-based weapons and ground-based anti-satellite weapons. Given the necessary political will, it is feasible to “adequately verify” these constraints. The verification regime should permit the incorporation of new measures in the future, combine international technical means and national technical means, combine remote-sensing technologies and on-site inspections, and be complemented by transparency and confidence-building measures.     

浅析高功率微波武器的研究与发展

随着外层空间日益军事化,作为反卫星武器的高功率微波武器的研究与发展备受关注,其军事价值日益显现.对高功率微波武器的作用效能及特点作了详细分析,重点评述了各主要军事强国在高功率微波武器方面的研究情况.最后分析了高功率微波武器的发展趋势.     

Scientists and arms control in outer space

Scientists have a special responsibility in helping to further the goal of arms control in outer space. Allan Din argues that it is incumbent upon them to study the development of weapons and the arms race, influence policy making at the national and international levels, and publicize the necessity of arms control. The author believes that a treaty controlling use of anti-satellite weapons is urgently required, while a long-term goal must be the formation of an international satellite monitoring agency to regulate use of intelligence-gathering indirect weapons.     

Arms control and disarmament in space: the rough road to Vienna 1984 : Part II

This article continues a detailed examination of the international legal and diplomatic questions relating to arms control and disarmament, focusing on space-based activities. These are importantly concerned with the development of anti-satellite (ASAT) systems and ballistic missile defence (BMD). This part of the article considers the US Presidential-Congressional dialogue - particularly the ASAT testing issue - and Presidential initiatives vis-à-vis the USSR. An epilogue to the original paper considers the diplomatic moves and policy shifts which contributed to the January 1985 US-Soviet meeting and the agreement to begin bilateral negotiations to consider space and nuclear arms.     

“Space superiority”: Wernher von Braun's campaign for a nuclear-armed space station, 1946–1956

The literature on the history of spaceflight has depicted the early 1950s Collier’s articles mostly as a forerunner to the peaceful and scientific exploration of space. Yet the centerpiece of Wernher von Braun's plan was a manned space station that would serve as reconnaissance platform and orbiting battle station for achieving “space superiority” over the USSR. One its roles could be the launching of nuclear missiles. When challenged as to the station's defensibility, von Braun even posited pre-emptive atomic strikes from space as a response to the development of a hostile anti-satellite capability.     

The science and politics of an Indian ASAT capability

India has recently stated an intention to develop an anti-satellite (ASAT) capability. The reasons for this may include the country’s growing economic and political clout, alongside the increasing importance of space to this status, the significance of space assets to the military, a perceived threat from China, and fear of being disadvantaged in future treaty negotiations if not ‘in the club’. Nevertheless, development and use of an ASAT would have potentially catastrophic debris-related consequences that would also create major political problems for the user. The state of India’s ASAT activities is described and recommendations on avoiding hasty development, such as researching methods of protecting satellites, strengthening bilateral relations with China and pushing for a legally binding norm on ASATs, are made.     

The militarization of space: A policy out of step with world events?

The onset of the Space Age had strong military overtones, but these were restrained by international agreement and the creation of civilian-led agencies such as NASA. Currently, however, a number of developments threaten to seriously undermine the concept of peaceful utilization of space, in particular the Strategic Defense Initiative, anti-satellite weapons research, and the routine intentional destruction of military satellites. There are nevertheless several factors mitigating military influence in space: the arrival of ‘non-superpowers’ as significant space explorers; greater ecological awareness; the virtual end of the Cold War; reaction against the cost and wastefulness of open-ended military expenditure; and the realization of the comparative efficiency of civil as opposed to military space expenditure in stimulating industry.