排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
G. Randall Gladstone Steven C. Persyn John S. Eterno Brandon C. Walther David C. Slater Michael W. Davis Maarten H. Versteeg Kristian B. Persson Michael K. Young Gregory J. Dirks Anthony O. Sawka Jessica Tumlinson Henry Sykes John Beshears Cherie L. Rhoad James P. Cravens Gregory S. Winters Robert A. Klar Walter Lockhart Benjamin M. Piepgrass Thomas K. Greathouse Bradley J. Trantham Philip M. Wilcox Matthew W. Jackson Oswald H. W. Siegmund John V. Vallerga Rick Raffanti Adrian Martin J.-C. Gérard Denis C. Grodent Bertrand Bonfond Benoit Marquet François Denis 《Space Science Reviews》2017,213(1-4):447-473
The ultraviolet spectrograph instrument on the Juno mission (Juno-UVS) is a long-slit imaging spectrograph designed to observe and characterize Jupiter’s far-ultraviolet (FUV) auroral emissions. These observations will be coordinated and correlated with those from Juno’s other remote sensing instruments and used to place in situ measurements made by Juno’s particles and fields instruments into a global context, relating the local data with events occurring in more distant regions of Jupiter’s magnetosphere. Juno-UVS is based on a series of imaging FUV spectrographs currently in flight—the two Alice instruments on the Rosetta and New Horizons missions, and the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission. However, Juno-UVS has several important modifications, including (1) a scan mirror (for targeting specific auroral features), (2) extensive shielding (for mitigation of electronics and data quality degradation by energetic particles), and (3) a cross delay line microchannel plate detector (for both faster photon counting and improved spatial resolution). This paper describes the science objectives, design, and initial performance of the Juno-UVS. 相似文献
2.
C. W. F. Everitt M. Adams W. Bencze S. Buchman B. Clarke J. W. Conklin D. B. DeBra M. Dolphin M. Heifetz D. Hipkins T. Holmes G. M. Keiser J. Kolodziejczak J. Li J. Lipa J. M. Lockhart J. C. Mester B. Muhlfelder Y. Ohshima B. W. Parkinson M. Salomon A. Silbergleit V. Solomonik K. Stahl M. Taber J. P. Turneaure S. Wang P. W. Worden Jr. 《Space Science Reviews》2009,148(1-4):53-69
This is the first of five connected papers detailing progress on the Gravity Probe B (GP-B) Relativity Mission. GP-B, launched 20 April 2004, is a landmark physics experiment in space to test two fundamental predictions of Einstein’s general relativity theory, the geodetic and frame-dragging effects, by means of cryogenic gyroscopes in Earth orbit. Data collection began 28 August 2004 and science operations were completed 29 September 2005. The data analysis has proven deeper than expected as a result of two mutually reinforcing complications in gyroscope performance: (1) a changing polhode path affecting the calibration of the gyroscope scale factor C g against the aberration of starlight and (2) two larger than expected manifestations of a Newtonian gyro torque due to patch potentials on the rotor and housing. In earlier papers, we reported two methods, ‘geometric’ and ‘algebraic’, for identifying and removing the first Newtonian effect (‘misalignment torque’), and also a preliminary method of treating the second (‘roll-polhode resonance torque’). Central to the progress in both torque modeling and C g determination has been an extended effort on “Trapped Flux Mapping” commenced in November 2006. A turning point came in August 2008 when it became possible to include a detailed history of the resonance torques into the computation. The East-West (frame-dragging) effect is now plainly visible in the processed data. The current statistical uncertainty from an analysis of 155 days of data is 5.4 marc-s/yr (~14% of the predicted effect), though it must be emphasized that this is a preliminary result requiring rigorous investigation of systematics by methods discussed in the accompanying paper by Muhlfelder et al. A covariance analysis incorporating models of the patch effect torques indicates that a 3–5% determination of frame-dragging is possible with more complete, computationally intensive data analysis. 相似文献
3.
Barraclough B.L. Dors E.E. Abeyta R.A. Alexander J.F. Ameduri F.P. Baldonado J.R. Bame S.J. Casey P.J. Dirks G. Everett D.T. Gosling J.T. Grace K.M. Guerrero D.R. Kolar J.D. Kroesche J.L. Lockhart W.L. McComas D.J. Mietz D.E. Roese J. Sanders J. Steinberg J.T. Tokar R.L. Urdiales C. Wiens R.C. 《Space Science Reviews》2003,105(3-4):627-660
The Genesis Ion Monitor (GIM) and the Genesis Electron Monitor (GEM) provide 3-dimensional plasma measurements of the solar
wind for the Genesis mission. These measurements are used onboard to determine the type of plasma that is flowing past the
spacecraft and to configure the solar wind sample collection subsystems in real-time. Both GIM and GEM employ spherical-section
electrostatic analyzers followed by channel electron multiplier (CEM) arrays for detection and angle and energy/charge analysis
of incident ions and electrons. GIM is of a new design specific to Genesis mission requirements whereas the GEM sensor is
an almost exact copy of the plasma electron sensors currently flying on the ACE and Ulysses spacecraft, albeit with new electronics
and programming. Ions are detected at forty log-spaced energy levels between ∼ 1 eV and 14 keV by eight CEM detectors, while
electrons with energies between ∼ 1 eV and 1.4 keV are measured at twenty log-spaced energy levels using seven CEMs. The spin
of the spacecraft is used to sweep the fan-shaped fields-of-view of both instruments across all areas of the sky of interest,
with ion measurements being taken forty times per spin and samples of the electron population being taken twenty four times
per spin. Complete ion and electron energy spectra are measured every ∼ 2.5 min (four spins of the spacecraft) with adequate
energy and angular resolution to determine fully 3-dimensional ion and electron distribution functions. The GIM and GEM plasma
measurements are principally used to enable the operational solar wind sample collection goals of the Genesis mission but
they also provide a potentially very useful data set for studies of solar wind phenomena, especially if combined with other
solar wind data sets from ACE, WIND, SOHO and Ulysses for multi-spacecraft investigations.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
4.
Nordholt Jane E. Wiens Roger C. Abeyta Rudy A. Baldonado Juan R. Burnett Donald S. Casey Patrick Everett Daniel T. Kroesche Joseph Lockhart Walter L. MacNeal Paul McComas David J. Mietz Donald E. Moses Ronald W. Neugebauer Marcia Poths Jane Reisenfeld Daniel B. Storms Steven A. Urdiales Carlos 《Space Science Reviews》2003,105(3-4):561-599
The primary goal of the Genesis Mission is to collect solar wind ions and, from their analysis, establish key isotopic ratios
that will help constrain models of solar nebula formation and evolution. The ratios of primary interest include 17O/16O and 18O/16O to ±0.1%, 15N/14N to ±1%, and the Li, Be, and B elemental and isotopic abundances. The required accuracies in N and O ratios cannot be achieved
without concentrating the solar wind and implanting it into low-background target materials that are returned to Earth for
analysis. The Genesis Concentrator is designed to concentrate the heavy ion flux from the solar wind by an average factor
of at least 20 and implant it into a target of ultra-pure, well-characterized materials. High-transparency grids held at high
voltages are used near the aperture to reject >90% of the protons, avoiding damage to the target. Another set of grids and
applied voltages are used to accelerate and focus the remaining ions to implant into the target. The design uses an energy-independent
parabolic ion mirror to focus ions onto a 6.2 cm diameter target of materials selected to contain levels of O and other elements
of interest established and documented to be below 10% of the levels expected from the concentrated solar wind. To optimize
the concentration of the ions, voltages are constantly adjusted based on real-time solar wind speed and temperature measurements
from the Genesis ion monitor. Construction of the Concentrator required new developments in ion optics; materials; and instrument
testing and handling.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
1