|
|||||
|
|
| 在响应曲面方法中三类中心复合设计的比较研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 张志红,何桢,郭伟. 在响应曲面方法中三类中心复合设计的比较研究[J]. 沈阳航空工业学院学报, 2007, 24(1): 87-91 |
| 作者姓名： | 张志红 何桢 郭伟 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 天津大学机械工程博士后流动站,天津,300072;山东经济学院,山东,济南,250014 2. 天津大学管理学院,天津,300072 3. 天津大学机械学院,天津,300072 |
| 摘 要： | 对响应曲面方法中最重要的三类中心复合设计(CCDs)-外切中心复合设计(CCC)、嵌套中心复合设计(CCI)和面心立方设计(CCF)进行了比较研究。首先论述了CCDs中的关键概念并分析了CCC、CCI和CCF的特点,进而探讨了评价CCDs的准则,而后通过模拟分别从设计域和设计的稳健性方面对这三类设计进行了评价比较,从而将为实践应用提供更好的指导。 |
| 关 键 词： | 外切中心复合设计 嵌套中心复合设计 面心立方设计 评价比较 稳健性 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-1385（2007）01-0087-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-11-29 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-11-29 |
A comparative study of three central composite designs in response surface methodology |
|
| ZHANG Zhi-hong,HE Zhen,GUO Wei. A comparative study of three central composite designs in response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, 2007, 24(1): 87-91 | |
| Authors: | ZHANG Zhi-hong HE Zhen GUO Wei |
| Affiliation: | Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Management School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 |
| Abstract: | This paper presents a comparative study of three important Central Composite Designs(CCDs) which including Central Composite Circumscribed design(CCC),Central Composite Inscribed design(CCI) and Central Composite Face-centered design(CCF) in Response Surface Methodology.Characteristics of the three designs were analyzed and guide lines were provided with some key concepts about CCDs.Then we evaluate and compare CCC,CCI and CCF from the view of design region and robustness through simulation.This study will provide better guidance for the applications of CCDs. |
| Keywords: | CCC CCI CCF evaluation comparison robustness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |