| 不安抗辩权与预期违约之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李红伟. 不安抗辩权与预期违约之比较[J]. 沈阳航空工业学院学报, 2004, 21(6): 16-18 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李红伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 沈阳理工大学社科部,辽宁,沈阳,110168 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《合同法》在第68条和第69条规定了不安抗辩权制度．在第108条规定了明示预期违约。但《合同法》对英美法系的预期违约制度和大陆法系的不安抗辩权制度融合的不够彻底。使预期违约和不安抗辩权在适用上产生了混乱。提出了通过对两大法系相关制度的比较来完善我国合同立法的思路。
|
| 关 键 词： | 合同法 不安抗辩权 预期违约 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-1385(2004)06-0016-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-04-22 |
A comparison between the unstable counter-argument right and anticipatory breach of contract |
| |
| LI Hong-wei. A comparison between the unstable counter-argument right and anticipatory breach of contract[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, 2004, 21(6): 16-18 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Hong-wei |
| |
| Abstract: | The Contract Law of China stipulates unstable counter-argument right in item 68 and 69, stipulates anticipatory breach of contract in item 100 and 80. However, one of them belong to Civil Law System and another of Anglo-American law System . The Contract Law of China doesn't mix them together thoroughly and brings about application of disorder. Through comparing with related laws of two legal systems, we make suggestion how to perfect The Contract Law of China. |
| |
| Keywords: | the Contract Law of China unstable counter-argument right anticipatory breach of contract comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
