首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Benefits and challenges of voluntary contribution to GEOSS
Authors:Christine Heumesser  Steffen Fritz  Michael Obersteiner  Jay Pearlman  Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa
Institution:1. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria;2. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Ecosystems Services and Management Program, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria;3. IEEE Committee on Earth Observation, 2241 Prescott Ave SW, Seattle, WA 98126, USA;4. University of Colorado, National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Boulder, CO 80309-0449, USA
Abstract:The vision of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) is the achievement of societal benefits through voluntary contribution and sharing of data, metadata and products at no or minimum cost. Such undertakings, where contribution provides positive externalities, benefiting contributors and non-contributors alike, are often described as ‘social dilemmas’, usually resulting in small levels of voluntary contribution. We investigate the benefits and challenges of voluntary contribution to GEOSS, surveying economic and game theoretic literature and examining how the concepts of social dilemmas apply to the provision of GEOSS. We conduct an exploratory survey among individuals involved in the Group on Earth Observation (GEO) to understand their perception of voluntarily contribution. Even though contribution to GEOSS was perceived as rather low, e.g. because of a perceived lack of funds, commitment or organization, survey respondents also perceived many (exclusive) benefits of contribution, e.g. networking, visibility for their work or collaborating with motivated individuals. To increase participation, respondents suggested increasing financial support and raising awareness of GEOSS. We conclude that communicating the efficacy of individuals' contributions, the personal benefits of contribution and strengthening of group identity and knowledge about fellow participants' work can constitute incentives for future voluntary contribution. This could be facilitated by an externally established institution providing a framework for cooperation, or by institutions, agreements or frameworks agreed upon by contributors themselves.
Keywords:GEOSS  Collective action  Social dilemmas  Game theory  Survey approach
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号