首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

国内外航空发动机研制过程中评审工作的对比分析
引用本文:杨锐,郝勇,张恩和,李其汉.国内外航空发动机研制过程中评审工作的对比分析[J].航空动力学报,2006,21(6):1059-1063.
作者姓名:杨锐  郝勇  张恩和  李其汉
作者单位:1. 北京航空航天大学,能源与动力工程学院,北京,100083
2. 沈阳发动机设计研究所,辽宁,沈阳,110015
摘    要:评审是航空发动机研制过程中一个必不可少,至关重要的阶段,组织缜密、有效地评审对于降低研制风险、缩短周期、减少反复将起到不可或缺的作用.本文分别介绍了罗罗公司对某高压压气机技术方案的评审,和国内某发动机技术设计的评审.通过对评审人员的组成、评审内容和资料的准备以及评审结论、跟踪检查的对比,分析了两次评审在评审过程、评审机制等方面的差异.

关 键 词:航空、航天推进系统  评审  高压压气机  罗罗公司
文章编号:1000-8055(2006)06-1059-05
收稿时间:2006/3/21 0:00:00
修稿时间:2006年3月21日

Analysis of the difference between reviews of overseas and domestic aero-engine in developing process
YANG Rui,HAO Yong,ZHANG En-he and LI Qi-han.Analysis of the difference between reviews of overseas and domestic aero-engine in developing process[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2006,21(6):1059-1063.
Authors:YANG Rui  HAO Yong  ZHANG En-he and LI Qi-han
Institution:School of Jet Propulsion, Beijing University of Aeronautics and astronautics, Beijing 100083, China;Shenyang Aeroengine Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China;Shenyang Aeroengine Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China;School of Jet Propulsion, Beijing University of Aeronautics and astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:The review is absolutely necessary matter and phase in the developing process of an aero-engine.The pertinent and effective review is a great help to the aero-engine being developed.The concept review of a HP Compressor which carried out broadly according to the formal Rolls-Royce technical review was introduced and a domestic aero-engine concept review was introduced also.The two review process and mechanism and etc.were analyzed according to the comparing with the review committee,prepared data,and review conclusions as well as tracicing examination.
Keywords:aerospace propulsion system  review  HP Compressor  Rolls-Royce company
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《航空动力学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《航空动力学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号