| 《儒林外史》及其英译本人称照应衔接手段对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李冰.《儒林外史》及其英译本人称照应衔接手段对比[J].西安航空技术高等专科学校学报,2011,29(2):73-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李冰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 平顶山学院,公共外语教学部,河北,平顶山,467000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 人称照应衔接手段存在于英汉两种语言中。基于韩礼德的衔接理论,以《儒林外史》及其英译本为例,对比英汉语中人称照应衔接手段的异同,并从意合与形合,螺旋型与直线型及语法化程度对差异进行解释。
|
| 关 键 词： | 儒林外史 衔接 人称照应 对比 |
A Contrastive Study of Personal Reference in The Scholars and Its English Version |
| |
| LI Bing.A Contrastive Study of Personal Reference in The Scholars and Its English Version[J].Journal of Xi'an Aerotechnical College,2011,29(2):73-76. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Bing |
| |
| Institution: | LI Bing(Public English Department,Pingdingshan University,Pingdingshan 467000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Personal reference exists in English and Chinese as grammatical cohesive device.Based on Halliday’s cohesion theory,the paper makes a contrast of Personal reference in The Scholars and its English version and explains the differences from the perspective of paratactic vs.hypotactic,spiral vs.linear and degree of grammaticalization. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Scholars Cohesion Personal reference Contrastive study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
