首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

航空发动机液压管路静压力损失分析及试验验证
引用本文:陆 浩,周毅博. 航空发动机液压管路静压力损失分析及试验验证[J]. 航空发动机, 2016, 42(3): 88-92. DOI: 10.13477/j.cnki.aeroengine.2016.03.017
作者姓名:陆 浩  周毅博
作者单位:中航工业航空动力控制系统研究所,江苏无锡,214063
摘    要:液压机械装置(HMU)燃油管路的设计是否合理将直接影响到油液静压力的传递损失和各液压元件的工作特性.为了研究燃油管路内部流动损失机理,验证相关计算方法的置信度,针对典型管路静压力损失,采用锐边节流公式和短管节流公式进行了理论计算,并进行了CFD仿真分析,对计算结果进行了试验验证.计算与试验结果对比分析表明:液流的静压力损失主要出现在进口环腔与管路的交界处,管路下游液流的静压力与出口环腔内一致;锐边节流公式的计算结果相对偏大,而短管节流公式的计算结果更接近于试验值.

关 键 词:液压机械装置  燃油管路  压力损失  数值模拟  试验

Investigation and Experimental Validation on Static Pressure Loss of Aeroengine Hydraulic Pipe
LU Hao,ZHOU Yi-bo. Investigation and Experimental Validation on Static Pressure Loss of Aeroengine Hydraulic Pipe[J]. Aeroengine, 2016, 42(3): 88-92. DOI: 10.13477/j.cnki.aeroengine.2016.03.017
Authors:LU Hao  ZHOU Yi-bo
Affiliation:AVIC Aviation Motor Control System Institute, Wuxi Jiangsu 214063, China
Abstract:Design of fuel pipe have direct effect on the transmission loss of static pressure and the performance of hydraulic components for aeroengine Hydro-Mechanical Unit (HMU) . In order to investigate the pressure loss mechanism and validate the confidence coefficient of relative numerical methods, the static pressure loss of a typical fuel pipe was calculated with the sharp edge throttle formula, the stub pipe throttle formula and CFD numerical simulation. Finally, experiments were conducted to verify the calculation results. Results indicate that the static pressure loss mainly exits at the junction between inlet cavity and pipe, and downstream of the pipe has the same static pressure with the outlet cavity. The shape edge throttle formula predicts a higher static pressure loss while the results of stub pipe throttle formula have a better agreement with the experiment results.
Keywords:HMU   fuel pipe   pressure loss   numerical simulation   experiment
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《航空发动机》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《航空发动机》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号