首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于交叉射流与切向旋流的CH_4柔和燃烧特性对比
引用本文:黄明明,邵卫卫,张哲巅,熊燕,刘艳,雷福林,肖云汉.基于交叉射流与切向旋流的CH_4柔和燃烧特性对比[J].航空动力学报,2014,29(1):31-41.
作者姓名:黄明明  邵卫卫  张哲巅  熊燕  刘艳  雷福林  肖云汉
作者单位:中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069;中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069;中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069;中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069;中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069;中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069;中国科学院 工程热物理研究所 先进能源动力重点实验室, 北京 100190;中国科学院 能源动力研究中心, 江苏 连云港 222069
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51006104,51206168)
摘    要:轴向分级柔和燃烧器中,采用了交叉射流、切向旋流两种掺混方式,通过实验结合数值计算的方法,从流场和组分分布角度比较了两种掺混方式的掺混特点,从火焰特征、NO/CO排放方面比较了燃烧性能.实验以甲烷为燃料,热功率为16.2~25.9kW,相对切向旋流,交叉射流延缓了燃料、空气的直接混合,燃料、空气燃烧前经回流烟气充分预热和稀释,火焰根部有抬升,反应区体积大,火焰特征更接近柔和燃烧.同时,交叉射流分级燃烧器的污染物排放性能更优,回流比例为0.5、当量比为0.6时,烟气中NO和CO体积分数均仅为4×10-6.

关 键 词:分级燃烧  柔和燃烧  交叉射流  切向旋流  OH*  NO/CO排放
收稿时间:2012/11/27 0:00:00

Comparison of CH4 moderate or intense low-oxygen dilution combustion characteristics based on cross-flow jet mixing and swirl mixing
HUANG Ming-ming,SHAO Wei-wei,ZHANG Zhe-dian,XIONG Yan,LIU Yan,LEI Fu-lin and XIAO Yun-han.Comparison of CH4 moderate or intense low-oxygen dilution combustion characteristics based on cross-flow jet mixing and swirl mixing[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(1):31-41.
Authors:HUANG Ming-ming  SHAO Wei-wei  ZHANG Zhe-dian  XIONG Yan  LIU Yan  LEI Fu-lin and XIAO Yun-han
Institution:Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Research Center for Clean Energy and Power, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222069, China
Abstract:Two axially-staged moderate or intense low-oxygen dilution(MILD) configurations, based on cross-flow jet mixing and swirl mixing, were numerically and experimentally studied to compare their mixing performance from flow field pattern and species distribution, and to compare their combustion property from flame behavior and NO and CO emissions. The experiment fuel was methane and the heat load was regulated in the range of 16.2 to 25.9kW. The mixing between fuel and air stream is delayed in the cross-flow jet mixing configuration compared to the swirl mixing configuration, and thereby the recirculated hot flue gas preheats and diluts the fuel and air stream before spontaneous reaction in the former configuration. Compared to the swirl mixing configuration, higher flame lift-off height and more spatially distributed flame are observed in the cross-flow jet mixing configuration, of which flame behavior is also closer to MILD combustion. Furthermore, lower NO and CO emissions are observed for the cross-flow jet mixing staged combustor; at gas recirculation ratio of 0.5 and equivalence ratio of 0.6, the volume fractions of NO and CO in the flue gas are both 4×10-6.
Keywords:staged combustion  MILD combustion  cross-flow jet mixing  swirl mixing  OH*  NO/CO emission
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《航空动力学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《航空动力学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号