首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

天宫一号大气密度探测数据与模式的比较分析
引用本文:陈华姣,秦国泰,李永平,何玉梅,朱光武. 天宫一号大气密度探测数据与模式的比较分析[J]. 载人航天, 2013, 0(6): 34-38
作者姓名:陈华姣  秦国泰  李永平  何玉梅  朱光武
作者单位:中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心,北京100190
摘    要:利用天宫一号的轨道大气环境探测器在2012年12月7日至2013年1月4日,地磁活动平静下的大气密度探测数据,与NRLMSISE-00和JB2008模式进行比较。与实测数据相比,NRLMSISE4)0模式整体高估11.6%,而JB2008整体低估9.8%。JB2008模式在逐日变化趋势方面与实测结果更吻合,更好地反映了太阳辐射对热层大气的影响;而NRLMSISE-00在平静期间地磁活动影响大气密度的变化特征上,比JB2008更符合实测结果。实测结果显示冬季半球日峰值出现时间比夏季半球早,JB2008与实测相符,NRLMSISE-00则与实测相反。整体而言,在天宫一号轨道高度、地磁平静期,JB2008模式优于NRLMSISE-00模式。

关 键 词:天宫一号  大气密度  NRLMSISE-00模式  JB2008模式

Comparison and Analysis Between TianGong-1 Atmospheric Density and Thermospheric Model
Chen Huajiao,Qin Guotai,Li Yongping,He Yumei,Zhu Guangwu. Comparison and Analysis Between TianGong-1 Atmospheric Density and Thermospheric Model[J]. Manned spaceflight, 2013, 0(6): 34-38
Authors:Chen Huajiao  Qin Guotai  Li Yongping  He Yumei  Zhu Guangwu
Affiliation:(Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China)
Abstract:Based on thermosphere density data from TianGong-1 form Dec. 7 2012 to Jan. 4 2013, when geomagnetic index was low, comparison between observed data and thermospheric model inclu- ding NRLMSISE-00 and JB2008 were made. The major results were as follows: the NRLMSISE-O0 model overestimated the observed data by about 11.6%. JB2008 model underestimated the observed data by about 9.8%. During low geomagnetic activity, ap index used in NRLMSISE-00 was more close to the observed data variation than that of DCT index used in JB2008 ; JB2008 was good at daily variation. On LT-latitude variation JB2008 could capture the main characteristics, while NRLM- SISE-00 was almost the opposite. Therefore JB2008 was better than NRLMSISE-00 at TianGong-1 altitude.
Keywords:Tian gong-1  atmospheric density  NRLMSISE-O0 model  JB2008 model
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号