气动计算软件集成系统中的远程控制

随着我国航空航天技术的飞速发展,气动计算软件集成技术日趋成熟,但用户在并行计算中需要手动输入的操作较多。鉴于此,通过编程开发了基于TCP／IP协议的FTP客户端应用程序,实现了对网格文件的信息采集、过滤并将其和参数、脚本文件等批量自动上传的功能。根据批处理文件中的命令,调用Windows平台自带的客户端Telnet,向远程集群管理节点发出命令,远程启动服务器集群的并行计算任务。最后,在客户端实现了远程控制服务器集群上的计算流体力学软件Fluent进行并行计算。结果表明：使用该远程控制系统能够减少用户输入操作,提高计算效率,保证数据的实时更新。     

基于滑模反演控制的稳定平台齿隙非线性补偿

针对航空遥感惯性稳定平台中齿隙非线性带来的不稳定问题,结合反演控制和滑模控制的优点,在传统反演控制的每一步迭代过程引入与齿轮运动状态相关的基于连续饱和函数的动态滑模面,设计了相应的滑模反演控制器。在保证了系统误差快速收敛的同时,抑制了反演过程中的误差积累,实现了系统非线性误差精确补偿。仿真实验结果表明,与传统反演控制相比,滑模反演控制显著降低了齿隙非线性对系统动态性能的影响,有效提高了系统对期望角位置、角速度的跟踪性能。     

轴流压气机转子内流场试验研究

在1台7级轴流压气机级性能、总性能、静叶角度优化、中间级引气的试验中,利用叶型受感部测取了各级转子出口总压、总温流场;同时采集各级转子后参数与总性能参数,为研究多级压气机级间匹配关系提供了1种可靠的测量方法。级间参数分析对比表明叶型受感部获取的试验数据真实可信。     

嵌入式远程监测系统的硬件设计

采用单片机和微控制器的监测系统己得到广泛的应用,但这些系统在数据处理、网络通讯等方面能力有限,无法适应远程实时监测的要求.采用新型32位嵌入式CPU进行了一种远程监测嵌入式系统解决方案的硬件设计.系统实现了8通道模拟信号采集,具有功耗低、体积小、集成度高等特点.采用SD卡存储技术、以太网技术以及USB技术,提高了系统智能化和网络化程度.系统可以实时地监测设备状态,对状态信息进行分析与保存,并可以通过网络提供设备运行状态信息.     

一种稳健的利用分布式小卫星获取宽域、高分辨SAR图像的方法

 传统星载合成孔径雷达(SAR)受最小天线面积条件的限制,其横向分辨率与测绘带宽度相矛盾,采用编队飞行的分布式小卫星SAR体制,可解决这一矛盾,即能够同时获得大测绘带、高分辨率的地面场景的SAR图像。主要研究如何在误差环境下抑制由小天线引入的多普勒模糊的信号处理方法。该方法利用子空间投影技术对导向矢量进行精确估计,在小卫星存在基线及其他误差时仍然能够稳健地恢复高分辨的二维SAR图像。     

超低轨道卫星应用离子电推进技术方案

低地球轨道大气环境对诸如科学探测和对地观测卫星的阻尼作用十分明显,而且阻尼随太阳和地磁活动以及昼夜、季节交替变化范围宽.为了保证卫星轨道精度或飞行状态满足任务要求,需要利用推进系统对卫星受到的阻尼进行实时或间歇式补偿以实现轨道或飞行状态的保持.针对轨道高度220～268 km的无拖曳飞行和轨道维持应用,基于卫星轨道阻尼...     

航天光学采样成像系统MTF的优化设计与MTFC

简要介绍了成像链、成像系统和遥感系统的概念;对像质和像质差异的表征和度量、成像系统性能的表征等予以说明;重点探讨航天光学采样成像系统MTF的优化设计与MTFC问题,并给出讨论结果。     

航天光学遥感器光学装调技术现状与展望

航天光学遥感器工作于太空中,长期恶劣的空间环境及短暂发射入轨时的状态对光学系统的设计与装调提出了苛刻的要求,确保光学系统在轨像质优异是航天光学遥感器研制的关键技术.文章结合国际上航天光学遥感器的发展需求对光学系统装调技术及发展现状进行了分析、总结,提出了中国后续航天光学遥感器装调与测试技术的突破方向.     

微纳聚合体卫星的对称式重构规划算法

为解决微纳聚合体卫星变构过程中,聚合体各部分之间的动力学耦合导致的卫星整体姿态翻转或紊乱,提出了一种对称式变构规划算法。首先建立了铰链约束下的漂浮基多刚体系统动力学模型,研究了重构过程中各运动模块对本体姿态的影响,提出当每两个运动模块位置与转动方向满足对称性条件时,两者对本体姿态的影响可在一定程度上相互抵消。基于上述理论,在A*算法中引入最优分配度量和对称性判定,设计了并行对称重构规划算法。仿真结果表明,该规划算法可实现重构过程中多模块并行、对称运动,重构过程总步数较少,运动模块对本体姿态的影响小。     

Earth observation from space – The issue of environmental sustainability

Remote sensing scientists work under assumptions that should not be taken for granted and should, therefore, be challenged. These assumptions include the following:1. Space, especially Low Earth Orbit (LEO), will always be available to governmental and commercial space entities that launch Earth remote sensing missions.2. Space launches are benign with respect to environmental impacts.3. Minimization of Type 1 error, which provides increased confidence in the experimental outcome, is the best way to assess the significance of environmental change.4. Large-area remote sensing investigations, i.e. national, continental, global studies, are best done from space.5. National space missions should trump international, cooperative space missions to ensure national control and distribution of the data products.At best, all of these points are arguable, and in some cases, they're wrong. Development of observational space systems that are compatible with sustainability principles should be a primary concern when Earth remote sensing space systems are envisioned, designed, and launched. The discussion is based on the hypothesis that reducing the environmental impacts of the data acquisition step, which is at the very beginning of the information stream leading to decision and action, will enhance coherence in the information stream and strengthen the capacity of measurement processes to meet their stated functional goal, i.e. sustainable management of Earth resources. We suggest that unconventional points of view should be adopted and when appropriate, remedial measures considered that could help to reduce the environmental footprint of space remote sensing and of Earth observation and monitoring systems in general. This article discusses these five assumptions in the context of sustainable management of Earth's resources. Taking each assumption in turn, we find the following:(1) Space debris may limit access to Low Earth Orbit over the next decades.(2) Relatively speaking, given that they're rare event, space launches may be benign, but study is merited on upper stratospheric and exospheric layers given the chemical activity associated with rocket combustion by-products.(3) Minimization of Type II error should be considered in situations where minimization of Type I error greatly hampers or precludes our ability to correct the environmental condition being studied.(4) In certain situations, airborne collects may be less expensive and more environmentally benign, and comparative studies should be done to determine which path is wisest.(5) International cooperation and data sharing will reduce instrument and launch costs and mission redundancy. Given fiscal concerns of most of the major space agencies – e.g. NASA, ESA, CNES – it seems prudent to combine resources.