急冷锅炉炉管结构优选分析

针对急冷锅炉采用ANSYS软件对急冷锅炉换热单元结构进行数值模拟,得到热负荷均匀情况下各炉管流量分配规律。根据辅助连接管的直径及位置提出6种结构方案,研究其流量分配规律,获得了最优结构。采用数值模拟研究得出最优结构入口联箱和扁圆管的速度场、压力场分布规律均较原结构均匀,从而验证这一结论的正确性。     

双脉冲发动机点火过程三维数值模拟

以喷射棒式双脉冲发动机燃烧室、级间隔离装置和喷管一体化为研究对象,采用数值仿真技术对Ⅱ脉冲点火过程三维流场特性进行分析研究。计算结果表明,点火初期燃气压力波峰超前于火焰峰到达级间隔离装置,并以压强冲击波形式传播,Ⅱ脉冲燃烧室相对高压区位置不断发生改变;级间孔打开过程对药柱末端压强影响较大,但对Ⅱ脉冲燃烧室压强整体上升过程影响较小;级间孔打开后,燃气经级间孔加速后形成高度欠膨胀射流,并在Ⅰ脉冲燃烧室内形成非对称带状低压区;级间孔分布的非对称性,导致压强及温度在发动机燃烧室中呈现显著的三维分布特性;高温区出现在隔板附近,而在装药前端、装药末端及外围级间孔轴线附近出现低温区。     

双模态冲压发动机燃烧室流场数值模拟研究

在三维、粘性、湍流及有化学反应的Navier-Stokes方程基础上，通过有限化学反应速率／涡扩散模型模化湍流燃烧，对以H2为燃料的双模态冲压发动机燃烧室流场进行了研究，分析了空燃比、燃料入射角、飞行马赫数对燃烧室工作模态的影响，并分析了燃烧室隔离段的作用。     

内外分区空间统一精度场建立方法研究

针对内外分区空间内结构和设备安装的数字化测量需求,研究内外参考点之间的关联技术,构建与外测量精度场相统一的内测量精度场。对于内外空间不同的开口数,利用多测点定位法、二测点和水平仪单站位定位法、二测点和水平仪双站位定位法等方法建立内精度场,实现与外精度场的统一。以某型设备为例进行试验表明,利用内外精度场测量同一检测点进行比较,测量的最大不一致误差为0.14 mm,证明构建模式可行、简单、可靠。     

基于马鞍形磁场的永磁直线电机位置解算方法

针对直线电机转子位置检测低成本和较高精度的要求,提出了一种基于马鞍形磁场来获得位置信息的方法及实现过程。分析了永磁体表面的磁场分布特征,指出了利用马鞍形磁场分布曲线来解算位置信息的优点,提出了根据马鞍形磁场推算位置信息的算法流程:先测得错开相位的2条马鞍形曲线数据,划分为4个象限后建立数据库;位置检测时,运用区间搜索算法寻得实际角度所在区间;再根据精度要求,采用合适的插值算法计算得到待解算的角度。仿真结果表明:基于马鞍形磁场的位置解算,能较好地得到直线电机转子的位置信息。     

基于里德堡原子相干效应的微波电场测量技术研究进展

近年来,采用里德堡原子的微波电场测量技术得到了迅速发展,获得了广泛应用。该电场探测技术是一项全新技术,可以将微波电场通过基本物理常数与频率测量直接关联,具有测量动态范围大、测量灵敏度高和测量不确定度小的特点,有望替代传统溯源路径,直接关联国际单位制（SI）。本文基于里德堡原子相干效应的微波电场测量技术原理,针对国内外微波电场的高准确度、高灵敏度和极化方向测量技术发展现状,和对微波电场测量的工程化光源系统,蒸气室探头的仿真验证实验和集成式蒸气室探头的设计研究等方面的相关进展做了详细介绍。     

光纤综合特性测试仪测量不确定度评定

根据计量工作中测量不确定度评定的实践经验,对光纤综合特性测试仪在计量时的测量不确定度进行了分析、评定。     

多重分形谱在材料分析中的应用研究

基于多重分形谱的物理意义，通过图像分析与处理技术，利用Delphi语言设计了图像结构的多重分形谱的计算程序。通过程序中图像黑白二值化转化阈值的设定，实现了从材料组织结构形貌图像上提取其相应的概率测度和标度指数的功能，并计算了它们的多重分形谱。分析表明：在对材料的组织结构进行研究的问题中，多重分形谱是一种有意义的表征参数，能够从多分形角度对材料的组织结构开展定量化的分析与解释。     

基于有限元方法的场磨式电场传感器标定装置优化设计

场磨式电场传感器常被用来测量特高压直流(HVDC)输电线路下地面合成电场强度.传统对其标定的方法存在标定装置体积较大、户外标定移动不方便的缺点.针对此问题研究了一种应用于特高压直流输电线路下地面合成电场测量的电场传感器便携式缩尺标定装置.基于有限元方法建立了传感器的三维电场模型,基于该模型对便携式标定装置的尺寸、结构等关键参数做出了模拟分析,在此基础上进行了便携式标定装置的结构参数的优化设计.将便携式缩尺标定装置与标准的标定装置进行了实验比较.仿真及实验结果表明该标定装置能够方便、准确地对场磨式电场传感器进行标定.      

GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients

The GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) monthly gravity models have been independently produced and published by several research institutions, such as Center for Space Research (CSR), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS). According to their processing standards, above institutions use the traditional variational approach except that the DEOS exploits the acceleration approach. The background force models employed are rather similar. The produced gravity field models generally agree with one another in the spatial pattern. However, there are some discrepancies in the gravity signal amplitude between solutions produced by different institutions. In particular, 10%–30% signal amplitude differences in some river basins can be observed. In this paper, we implemented a variant of the traditional variational approach and computed two sets of monthly gravity field solutions using the data from January 2005 to December 2006. The input data are K-band range-rates (KBRR) and kinematic orbits of GRACE satellites. The main difference in the production of our two types of models is how to deal with nuisance parameters. This type of parameters is necessary to absorb low-frequency errors in the data, which are mainly the aliasing and instrument errors. One way is to remove the nuisance parameters before estimating the geopotential coefficients, called NPARB approach in the paper. The other way is to estimate the nuisance parameters and geopotential coefficients simultaneously, called NPESS approach. These two types of solutions mainly differ in geopotential coefficients from degree 2 to 5. This can be explained by the fact that the nuisance parameters and the gravity field coefficients are highly correlated, particularly at low degrees. We compare these solutions with the official and published ones by means of spectral analysis. It is found that our solutions are, in general, consistent with others in the spatial pattern. The water storage variations of the Amazon, Chari and Ganges river basins have also been computed. The variations computed with the NPARB approach are closer to those produced by JPL and DEOS solutions, while the variations produced with the NPESS approach are in good agreement with those produced by the CSR and GFZ solutions. A simulation study is implemented with considering realistic noise and low-frequency error. The two approaches are used to recover the true model. The NPESS solution appears closer to the true one. Therefore we are inclined to estimate the nuisance parameters simultaneously with the geopential coefficients.