纤维增强复合材料圆柱壳的屈曲计算

本文利用各向异性多层扁壳的大挠度方程,探讨了正交各向异性多层圆柱壳,在考虑偶合效应和沿厚度方向剪切变形时的轴压,外压及其联合作用下的稳定性问题.用逆解法,给出正交各向异性多层圆柱壳在薄膜力作用下的临界载荷算式.进行了实例计算,并与国内、外实例的实验值比较,符合得相当好.     

基于小波分析的虚拟仪器

以小波分析原理为基础,开发出可视化和可操作的虚拟仪器,用于处理实验数据与药物分析.应用小波变换实现数据消噪,利用LabVIEW 和MATLAB软件开发出虚拟仪器.用该仪器可实现对数据进行消噪;在不经分离的情况下,对药物实现多组分的含量测定及对实验结果进行分析和预测,采用的方法和开发的软件在药学领域有其独到的应用价值.     

网上考试系统的设计与实现

本文讨论了一种新的考试方法———网上考试 ,并讨论了一种基于B/S系统实现网上考试的思路和设计方法 ,并对实现网上考试系统的部分关键技术进行了分析     

民机数据总线信号综合测试仪

介绍的民机数据总线信号测试仪综合了当前民机上主要采用的ARINC429、ARINC419、CSDB和RS232等数字式航空数据总线规范的接口，具有和这些总线接口设备通讯的能力，可以灵活方便地应用于机载设备检测，装机交联实验当中。     

TiAl合金不同钛铝比层片组织的稳定性

对钛铝比为１．１７４、１．１０５和１．０４１的（ＴｉＡｌ）－２．５Ｖ－１Ｃｒ（ａｔ％）合金层片组织在１３２３Ｋ热暴露中的组织变化进行了观察和分析。发现钛铝比对ＴｉＡｌ合金层片组织的稳定性和失稳分解机理有重要影响，钦铝比适当大于１：１（如１．１０５）的合金可以得到稳定性更好的层片组织。     

基于超声波的复合材料层间剪切强度表征分析

采用数字采样、相关分析、频谱分析等方法,结合部分复合材料层板剪切强度试验,验证材料性能与分析结果的对应性、研究分析参数的选择,为无损表征复合材料剪切强度的可行性做了有益的探索.     

SCR技术制备A2017半固态材料及其触变性能的研究

单辊搅拌技术 (SCRShearing/CoolingRollProcess)技术制备的A2 0 17半固态材料比常规铸造坯组织优良 ;SCR技术制备的A2 0 17半固态材料在 5 30～ 5 70℃范围内 ,可以进行触变成形 ;半固态成形平均屈服强度比热加工时的屈服强度低 10MPa ;A2 0 17半固态材料触变过程分为四个阶段 ,稳定触变阶段A2 0 17半固态材料的触变性能稳定 ,半固态加工时容许的最大加工变形范围为 6 4 %～ 72 %。     

产生标准失真源的方法

介绍了失真的测量原理和产生标准失真源的方法；介绍了失真度测量仪自动测试系统，并对测量装置的误差进行了分析。     

基于FW-H方程的旋翼气动声学计算研究

由流体力学N S方程导出的非齐次波动方程———FfowcsWilliams Hawkings方程(简称FW H方程),可以精确地描述在静止流体中运动的物体与流体相互作用的发声问题。以FW H方程为理论模型,将旋翼桨叶运动发声问题等效为包含桨叶的任意运动控制面(声源面)的声辐射问题,并在旋翼绕流Euler方程数值模拟的基础上,在时域内计算了悬停旋翼和前飞旋翼的声场。应用于UH 1H和AH 1/OLS两种旋翼模型的气动声学计算表明:计算结果与噪声实验值符合良好;所研制的程序不仅能够较准确地计算单极子噪声和偶极子噪声,而且具有较强的跨音速四极子噪声预测能力。     

Deep Impact: Working Properties for the Target Nucleus – Comet 9P/Tempel 1

In 1998, Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was chosen as the target of the Deep Impact mission (A’Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., and Delamere, A., Space Sci. Rev., 2005) even though very little was known about its physical properties. Efforts were immediately begun to improve this situation by the Deep Impact Science Team leading to the founding of a worldwide observing campaign (Meech et al., Space Sci. Rev., 2005a). This campaign has already produced a great deal of information on the global properties of the comet’s nucleus (summarized in Table I) that is vital to the planning and the assessment of the chances of success at the impact and encounter. Since the mission was begun the successful encounters of the Deep Space 1 spacecraft at Comet 19P/Borrelly and the Stardust spacecraft at Comet 81P/Wild 2 have occurred yielding new information on the state of the nuclei of these two comets. This information, together with earlier results on the nucleus of comet 1P/Halley from the European Space Agency’s Giotto, the Soviet Vega mission, and various ground-based observational and theoretical studies, is used as a basis for conjectures on the morphological, geological, mechanical, and compositional properties of the surface and subsurface that Deep Impact may find at 9P/Tempel 1. We adopt the following working values (circa December 2004) for the nucleus parameters of prime importance to Deep Impact as follows: mean effective radius = 3.25± 0.2 km, shape – irregular triaxial ellipsoid with a/b = 3.2± 0.4 and overall dimensions of ∼14.4 × 4.4 × 4.4 km, principal axis rotation with period = 41.85± 0.1 hr, pole directions (RA, Dec, J2000) = 46± 10, 73± 10 deg (Pole 1) or 287± 14, 16.5± 10 deg (Pole 2) (the two poles are photometrically, but not geometrically, equivalent), Kron-Cousins (V-R) color = 0.56± 0.02, V-band geometric albedo = 0.04± 0.01, R-band geometric albedo = 0.05± 0.01, R-band H(1,1,0) = 14.441± 0.067, and mass ∼7×10¹³ kg assuming a bulk density of 500 kg m⁻³. As these are working values, {i.e.}, based on preliminary analyses, it is expected that adjustments to their values may be made before encounter as improved estimates become available through further analysis of the large database being made available by the Deep Impact observing campaign. Given the parameters listed above the impact will occur in an environment where the local gravity is estimated at 0.027–0.04 cm s⁻² and the escape velocity between 1.4 and 2 m s⁻¹. For both of the rotation poles found here, the Deep Impact spacecraft on approach to encounter will find the rotation axis close to the plane of the sky (aspect angles 82.2 and 69.7 deg. for pole 1 and 2, respectively). However, until the rotation period estimate is substantially improved, it will remain uncertain whether the impactor will collide with the broadside or the ends of the nucleus.