在火箭发动机燃烧室中气相湍流流动的理论计算

本文用单流体湍流模型对液体火箭发动机突扩燃烧室中冷态气相流动的速度场和湍流强度分布进行了数值计算并与实验数据进行了对比和分析.     

涡轮泵实时故障检测的改进自适应相关阈值算法

1引言火箭发动机在飞行使用之前,需要分析试车振动数据以评估发动机的性能与状态[1]。涡轮泵是液体火箭发动机中最复杂故障概率最高的部件[2],而振动是涡轮泵故障的重要起因[3],因此,涡轮泵振动数据的分析显得尤为重要。目前,它的主要分析方法有时域统计[4]、频谱分析[5]、神经     

温室控制系统设计--用LCD实现控制参数设置与测量参数显示

说明了利用LCD显示模块,实现温室被测数据显示及控制参数的设定输入,其特点是显示数据的汉字名称与测量数据动态变化,系统连接线少,安装,测试,维修简单.     

网上考试系统的设计与实现

本文讨论了一种新的考试方法———网上考试 ,并讨论了一种基于B/S系统实现网上考试的思路和设计方法 ,并对实现网上考试系统的部分关键技术进行了分析     

民机数据总线信号综合测试仪

介绍的民机数据总线信号测试仪综合了当前民机上主要采用的ARINC429、ARINC419、CSDB和RS232等数字式航空数据总线规范的接口，具有和这些总线接口设备通讯的能力，可以灵活方便地应用于机载设备检测，装机交联实验当中。     

TiAl合金不同钛铝比层片组织的稳定性

对钛铝比为１．１７４、１．１０５和１．０４１的（ＴｉＡｌ）－２．５Ｖ－１Ｃｒ（ａｔ％）合金层片组织在１３２３Ｋ热暴露中的组织变化进行了观察和分析。发现钛铝比对ＴｉＡｌ合金层片组织的稳定性和失稳分解机理有重要影响，钦铝比适当大于１：１（如１．１０５）的合金可以得到稳定性更好的层片组织。     

近代大型液体火箭发动机的特点

本文对近代大型液体火箭发动机的特点进行了综述和分析.文中指出:使用高能、无毒的液氧、煤油和液氧、液氢为大型液体火箭发动机的推进剂势在必行;采用高压补燃循环系统可以明显提高发动机的比冲、减小发动机尺寸和质量;采用推进剂利用系统可以减少推进剂的剩余量,以提高运载火箭的有效载荷;使用辅助增压泵可降低贮箱压力,并提高发动机主泵的入口压力,以保证主泵在没有汽蚀的条件下可靠工作;高可靠性、长寿命和重复使用对航天产品尤为重要.     

涡轮发动机聚氧减重探索

本文在聚氧提高航机部件性能，总体性能的研究基础上，进一步探索航空发动机聚氧减重的规律，提供聚氧缩短压气机、燃烧室、涡轮轴向尺寸、减少发动机直径、减轻上述核心机部件和发动机总重量的理论依据，可供航机预研参考。     

基于FW-H方程的旋翼气动声学计算研究

由流体力学N S方程导出的非齐次波动方程———FfowcsWilliams Hawkings方程(简称FW H方程),可以精确地描述在静止流体中运动的物体与流体相互作用的发声问题。以FW H方程为理论模型,将旋翼桨叶运动发声问题等效为包含桨叶的任意运动控制面(声源面)的声辐射问题,并在旋翼绕流Euler方程数值模拟的基础上,在时域内计算了悬停旋翼和前飞旋翼的声场。应用于UH 1H和AH 1/OLS两种旋翼模型的气动声学计算表明:计算结果与噪声实验值符合良好;所研制的程序不仅能够较准确地计算单极子噪声和偶极子噪声,而且具有较强的跨音速四极子噪声预测能力。     

Deep Impact: Working Properties for the Target Nucleus – Comet 9P/Tempel 1

In 1998, Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was chosen as the target of the Deep Impact mission (A’Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., and Delamere, A., Space Sci. Rev., 2005) even though very little was known about its physical properties. Efforts were immediately begun to improve this situation by the Deep Impact Science Team leading to the founding of a worldwide observing campaign (Meech et al., Space Sci. Rev., 2005a). This campaign has already produced a great deal of information on the global properties of the comet’s nucleus (summarized in Table I) that is vital to the planning and the assessment of the chances of success at the impact and encounter. Since the mission was begun the successful encounters of the Deep Space 1 spacecraft at Comet 19P/Borrelly and the Stardust spacecraft at Comet 81P/Wild 2 have occurred yielding new information on the state of the nuclei of these two comets. This information, together with earlier results on the nucleus of comet 1P/Halley from the European Space Agency’s Giotto, the Soviet Vega mission, and various ground-based observational and theoretical studies, is used as a basis for conjectures on the morphological, geological, mechanical, and compositional properties of the surface and subsurface that Deep Impact may find at 9P/Tempel 1. We adopt the following working values (circa December 2004) for the nucleus parameters of prime importance to Deep Impact as follows: mean effective radius = 3.25± 0.2 km, shape – irregular triaxial ellipsoid with a/b = 3.2± 0.4 and overall dimensions of ∼14.4 × 4.4 × 4.4 km, principal axis rotation with period = 41.85± 0.1 hr, pole directions (RA, Dec, J2000) = 46± 10, 73± 10 deg (Pole 1) or 287± 14, 16.5± 10 deg (Pole 2) (the two poles are photometrically, but not geometrically, equivalent), Kron-Cousins (V-R) color = 0.56± 0.02, V-band geometric albedo = 0.04± 0.01, R-band geometric albedo = 0.05± 0.01, R-band H(1,1,0) = 14.441± 0.067, and mass ∼7×10¹³ kg assuming a bulk density of 500 kg m⁻³. As these are working values, {i.e.}, based on preliminary analyses, it is expected that adjustments to their values may be made before encounter as improved estimates become available through further analysis of the large database being made available by the Deep Impact observing campaign. Given the parameters listed above the impact will occur in an environment where the local gravity is estimated at 0.027–0.04 cm s⁻² and the escape velocity between 1.4 and 2 m s⁻¹. For both of the rotation poles found here, the Deep Impact spacecraft on approach to encounter will find the rotation axis close to the plane of the sky (aspect angles 82.2 and 69.7 deg. for pole 1 and 2, respectively). However, until the rotation period estimate is substantially improved, it will remain uncertain whether the impactor will collide with the broadside or the ends of the nucleus.