混杂纤维复合材料吸湿行为研究

 本文采用80℃水浸的方法,研究了不同类型混杂复合材料层压板的吸湿行为,找到描述混杂复合材料吸湿规律方程。同时,从理论上对混杂复合材料的平衡吸湿量及湿扩散系数进行了分析,建立了数学表达式,理论与实验较好吻合。     

一个基于WINDOWS环境的网络连接服务

该文介绍了在校园网环境及WINDOWS平台，采用TCP/IP协议设计并开发PING网络连接服务和客户机/服务器功能的VC^ 程序。     

环氧基复合材料的混合模式分层

 采用混合模式弯曲试验研究了Ｔ３００／Ｍ１０和ＨＴＡ／６３７６两种复合材料静态和疲劳加载的分层断裂行为。在不同α／Ｌ比和混合模式比条件下加载,两种材料呈现脆性不稳定或脆性稳定的裂纹扩展。在疲劳加载中,裂纹扩展始终是稳定的。混合模式比对分层韧性、疲劳裂纹扩展速率和疲劳门槛值均有明显影响。     

机翼/外挂系统的颤振主动抑制研究

 本文对颤振主动抑制控制律进行了研究。研究对象为一小展弦比带外侧导弹的机翼颤振模型,模型具有外侧后缘控制面。依据该模型的全部动力特性和刚度特性,以最优控制为基础,采用动态补偿器方法,设计了两阶控制律。对该控制律进行了风洞实验验证。实验结果表明:颤振临界速度提高了14％以上。理论计算结果与实验结果一致。     

网上考试系统的设计与实现

本文讨论了一种新的考试方法———网上考试 ,并讨论了一种基于B/S系统实现网上考试的思路和设计方法 ,并对实现网上考试系统的部分关键技术进行了分析     

民机数据总线信号综合测试仪

介绍的民机数据总线信号测试仪综合了当前民机上主要采用的ARINC429、ARINC419、CSDB和RS232等数字式航空数据总线规范的接口，具有和这些总线接口设备通讯的能力，可以灵活方便地应用于机载设备检测，装机交联实验当中。     

TiAl合金不同钛铝比层片组织的稳定性

对钛铝比为１．１７４、１．１０５和１．０４１的（ＴｉＡｌ）－２．５Ｖ－１Ｃｒ（ａｔ％）合金层片组织在１３２３Ｋ热暴露中的组织变化进行了观察和分析。发现钛铝比对ＴｉＡｌ合金层片组织的稳定性和失稳分解机理有重要影响，钦铝比适当大于１：１（如１．１０５）的合金可以得到稳定性更好的层片组织。     

短纤维增强复合材料纤维和界面层残余热应力分析

基于应力传递的剪滞理论，详细分析推导了纤维中的残余热正应力和界面层中的剪应力解析公式，并与已有的理论公式进行了比较。同时分析了纤维与基体脱粘的原因及热残余应力主要影响因素，主要包括：纤维和界面层材料的弹性模量，界面层的厚度以及纤维的长径比等。通过分析得出：纤维中的压应力和界面层中的剪应力都随着界面层的厚度及其弹性模量的增大而增大；纤维长径比的大小对纤维中的压应力和界面层中的剪应力大小及分布的影响很小。     

基于FW-H方程的旋翼气动声学计算研究

由流体力学N S方程导出的非齐次波动方程———FfowcsWilliams Hawkings方程(简称FW H方程),可以精确地描述在静止流体中运动的物体与流体相互作用的发声问题。以FW H方程为理论模型,将旋翼桨叶运动发声问题等效为包含桨叶的任意运动控制面(声源面)的声辐射问题,并在旋翼绕流Euler方程数值模拟的基础上,在时域内计算了悬停旋翼和前飞旋翼的声场。应用于UH 1H和AH 1/OLS两种旋翼模型的气动声学计算表明:计算结果与噪声实验值符合良好;所研制的程序不仅能够较准确地计算单极子噪声和偶极子噪声,而且具有较强的跨音速四极子噪声预测能力。     

Deep Impact: Working Properties for the Target Nucleus – Comet 9P/Tempel 1

In 1998, Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was chosen as the target of the Deep Impact mission (A’Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., and Delamere, A., Space Sci. Rev., 2005) even though very little was known about its physical properties. Efforts were immediately begun to improve this situation by the Deep Impact Science Team leading to the founding of a worldwide observing campaign (Meech et al., Space Sci. Rev., 2005a). This campaign has already produced a great deal of information on the global properties of the comet’s nucleus (summarized in Table I) that is vital to the planning and the assessment of the chances of success at the impact and encounter. Since the mission was begun the successful encounters of the Deep Space 1 spacecraft at Comet 19P/Borrelly and the Stardust spacecraft at Comet 81P/Wild 2 have occurred yielding new information on the state of the nuclei of these two comets. This information, together with earlier results on the nucleus of comet 1P/Halley from the European Space Agency’s Giotto, the Soviet Vega mission, and various ground-based observational and theoretical studies, is used as a basis for conjectures on the morphological, geological, mechanical, and compositional properties of the surface and subsurface that Deep Impact may find at 9P/Tempel 1. We adopt the following working values (circa December 2004) for the nucleus parameters of prime importance to Deep Impact as follows: mean effective radius = 3.25± 0.2 km, shape – irregular triaxial ellipsoid with a/b = 3.2± 0.4 and overall dimensions of ∼14.4 × 4.4 × 4.4 km, principal axis rotation with period = 41.85± 0.1 hr, pole directions (RA, Dec, J2000) = 46± 10, 73± 10 deg (Pole 1) or 287± 14, 16.5± 10 deg (Pole 2) (the two poles are photometrically, but not geometrically, equivalent), Kron-Cousins (V-R) color = 0.56± 0.02, V-band geometric albedo = 0.04± 0.01, R-band geometric albedo = 0.05± 0.01, R-band H(1,1,0) = 14.441± 0.067, and mass ∼7×10¹³ kg assuming a bulk density of 500 kg m⁻³. As these are working values, {i.e.}, based on preliminary analyses, it is expected that adjustments to their values may be made before encounter as improved estimates become available through further analysis of the large database being made available by the Deep Impact observing campaign. Given the parameters listed above the impact will occur in an environment where the local gravity is estimated at 0.027–0.04 cm s⁻² and the escape velocity between 1.4 and 2 m s⁻¹. For both of the rotation poles found here, the Deep Impact spacecraft on approach to encounter will find the rotation axis close to the plane of the sky (aspect angles 82.2 and 69.7 deg. for pole 1 and 2, respectively). However, until the rotation period estimate is substantially improved, it will remain uncertain whether the impactor will collide with the broadside or the ends of the nucleus.