《反垄断法》框架下的民航竞争政策要点分析

民航业作为我国市场经济体制改革的示范性行业,随着历次改革持续放松管制,行业发展迅速,市场呈现繁荣景象.随着去年国家发改委启动对管制性行业的反垄断调查, 《反垄断法》适用于民航业只是一个时间问题.民航局作为行业主管部门,应保持与《反垄断法》协调一致,继续以破解行政垄断难题,放松和改进市场管制,提供技术性服务等为要点,根据行业实际情况和自身职责制定和执行民航竞争政策.     

论高校学生管理法制内容的完善

围绕我国高校学生的培养目标,指出高校学生智育管理的法制还比较加强,但德育、体育的法制还需进一步完善,同时指出应不断完善学生求学过程中接触的相关人员的行为规范,力求使其确定化、制度化。     

西飞公司Nadcap特种工艺第三方认证

通过对Nadcap组织、项目、认证后带来的利益介绍,分析了Nadcap与ISO9001的差异,阐述了西飞公司进行Nadcap认证的必要性,认证的风险与优势及相应的认证流程;经过认证过程的实践,提出了Nadcap认证需要注意的五点建议。     

Space law education in China: Status quo,shortcomings and possible ways out

Space law education has an essential role in the space capacity building of a country because of its importance for human resources development in space law. Comparisons between Canada and China, the European Union and China and the United States of America (USA) and China in space law degree education, course, teaching methodology, institute and practice and communication platform are provided in an attempt to review some issues which exist within the Chinese space law educational system and to seek a better choice for China’s space law education reform. Chinese space law education has achieved noticeable progress over the past two decades. However, it is still limited in comparison to its counterparts in Europe and Northern America. The range of the space law degree education programmes and space-law-related courses is comparatively limited. A gap remains between space law education and practice in China. Chinese space law classes are still dominated by the teacher-centred teaching methodology, although several universities have some new teaching practices. The establishment of seven space law-related research institutes plays an increasingly important role in Chinese space law education, space law and policy research and legal advisory services for the Chinese government and non-governmental sectors. However, these institutes still have a long way to go in comparison with their counterparts in Europe and Northern America. While China has established domestic research platforms for space law communication through international cooperation, it does not provide space law practice platforms for space law education. While international space law does not provide a direct legal foundation for space law education in China, Chinese educational laws can lay a profound legal foundation for Chinese space law education. To promote its national expertise and capacity in space law, based on the three-pillar model and the experiences of its counterparts in North America and Europe, China should adopt a systematic and sustainable regime for its space law education.