一个基于WINDOWS环境的网络连接服务

该文介绍了在校园网环境及WINDOWS平台，采用TCP/IP协议设计并开发PING网络连接服务和客户机/服务器功能的VC^ 程序。     

机翼/外挂系统的颤振主动抑制研究

 本文对颤振主动抑制控制律进行了研究。研究对象为一小展弦比带外侧导弹的机翼颤振模型,模型具有外侧后缘控制面。依据该模型的全部动力特性和刚度特性,以最优控制为基础,采用动态补偿器方法,设计了两阶控制律。对该控制律进行了风洞实验验证。实验结果表明:颤振临界速度提高了14％以上。理论计算结果与实验结果一致。     

地球静止轨道通信卫星位置保持原理及实施策略

本文从工程应用的角度详尽地介绍了同步通信卫星在定点位置漂移的原因及计算方法，以我国在轨运行的东方红三号卫星和风云二号卫星为例，给出了大量工程实测数据，并给出了定点保持实施策略，它们已经成功地运用到我国在轨同步卫星的管理。     

网上考试系统的设计与实现

本文讨论了一种新的考试方法———网上考试 ,并讨论了一种基于B/S系统实现网上考试的思路和设计方法 ,并对实现网上考试系统的部分关键技术进行了分析     

民机数据总线信号综合测试仪

介绍的民机数据总线信号测试仪综合了当前民机上主要采用的ARINC429、ARINC419、CSDB和RS232等数字式航空数据总线规范的接口，具有和这些总线接口设备通讯的能力，可以灵活方便地应用于机载设备检测，装机交联实验当中。     

TiAl合金不同钛铝比层片组织的稳定性

对钛铝比为１．１７４、１．１０５和１．０４１的（ＴｉＡｌ）－２．５Ｖ－１Ｃｒ（ａｔ％）合金层片组织在１３２３Ｋ热暴露中的组织变化进行了观察和分析。发现钛铝比对ＴｉＡｌ合金层片组织的稳定性和失稳分解机理有重要影响，钦铝比适当大于１：１（如１．１０５）的合金可以得到稳定性更好的层片组织。     

结构的斜撑杆布局与优化分析

应用组合理论，通过改变六面体刚架结构面上的斜撑杆添加方向获得布局不同的模型，并采用有限元方法对相应的结构进行了静力分析和固有频率分析，对部分模型进行了静力实验。结果表明：不同斜撑杆布局结构的抗扭性能有明显变化，合理的布局不仅明显提高了结构的抗扭刚度，也降低了扭转工况下的应力水平；但布局的变化对结构的固有频率影响不明显。     

基于FW-H方程的旋翼气动声学计算研究

由流体力学N S方程导出的非齐次波动方程———FfowcsWilliams Hawkings方程(简称FW H方程),可以精确地描述在静止流体中运动的物体与流体相互作用的发声问题。以FW H方程为理论模型,将旋翼桨叶运动发声问题等效为包含桨叶的任意运动控制面(声源面)的声辐射问题,并在旋翼绕流Euler方程数值模拟的基础上,在时域内计算了悬停旋翼和前飞旋翼的声场。应用于UH 1H和AH 1/OLS两种旋翼模型的气动声学计算表明:计算结果与噪声实验值符合良好;所研制的程序不仅能够较准确地计算单极子噪声和偶极子噪声,而且具有较强的跨音速四极子噪声预测能力。     

激光微推进器用于微小卫星的姿轨控仿真

为研究激光微推进器用于微小卫星在轨空间飞行任务的可行性,利用已建立的激光推进微小卫星仿真平台,对微小卫星在轨姿态调整、轨道维持和轨道转移等飞行任务进行了仿真和分析。仿真结果表明,星载激光微推进器可满足在轨微小卫星的高控制精度姿态调整、近地观测轨道维持以及较长时间要求的轨道转移等空间任务对推进系统的要求。     

Deep Impact: Working Properties for the Target Nucleus – Comet 9P/Tempel 1

In 1998, Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was chosen as the target of the Deep Impact mission (A’Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., and Delamere, A., Space Sci. Rev., 2005) even though very little was known about its physical properties. Efforts were immediately begun to improve this situation by the Deep Impact Science Team leading to the founding of a worldwide observing campaign (Meech et al., Space Sci. Rev., 2005a). This campaign has already produced a great deal of information on the global properties of the comet’s nucleus (summarized in Table I) that is vital to the planning and the assessment of the chances of success at the impact and encounter. Since the mission was begun the successful encounters of the Deep Space 1 spacecraft at Comet 19P/Borrelly and the Stardust spacecraft at Comet 81P/Wild 2 have occurred yielding new information on the state of the nuclei of these two comets. This information, together with earlier results on the nucleus of comet 1P/Halley from the European Space Agency’s Giotto, the Soviet Vega mission, and various ground-based observational and theoretical studies, is used as a basis for conjectures on the morphological, geological, mechanical, and compositional properties of the surface and subsurface that Deep Impact may find at 9P/Tempel 1. We adopt the following working values (circa December 2004) for the nucleus parameters of prime importance to Deep Impact as follows: mean effective radius = 3.25± 0.2 km, shape – irregular triaxial ellipsoid with a/b = 3.2± 0.4 and overall dimensions of ∼14.4 × 4.4 × 4.4 km, principal axis rotation with period = 41.85± 0.1 hr, pole directions (RA, Dec, J2000) = 46± 10, 73± 10 deg (Pole 1) or 287± 14, 16.5± 10 deg (Pole 2) (the two poles are photometrically, but not geometrically, equivalent), Kron-Cousins (V-R) color = 0.56± 0.02, V-band geometric albedo = 0.04± 0.01, R-band geometric albedo = 0.05± 0.01, R-band H(1,1,0) = 14.441± 0.067, and mass ∼7×10¹³ kg assuming a bulk density of 500 kg m⁻³. As these are working values, {i.e.}, based on preliminary analyses, it is expected that adjustments to their values may be made before encounter as improved estimates become available through further analysis of the large database being made available by the Deep Impact observing campaign. Given the parameters listed above the impact will occur in an environment where the local gravity is estimated at 0.027–0.04 cm s⁻² and the escape velocity between 1.4 and 2 m s⁻¹. For both of the rotation poles found here, the Deep Impact spacecraft on approach to encounter will find the rotation axis close to the plane of the sky (aspect angles 82.2 and 69.7 deg. for pole 1 and 2, respectively). However, until the rotation period estimate is substantially improved, it will remain uncertain whether the impactor will collide with the broadside or the ends of the nucleus.