排序方式: 共有92条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
91.
免疫支持向量机用于航空发动机磨损故障诊断 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
航空发动机在使用寿命周期内会不断磨损最终出现故障,通过对发动机油液监测铁谱分析数据的挖掘可实现磨损故障的诊断。本文研究免疫算法优化的支持向量机(SVM)在航空发动机磨损故障诊断中的运用。首先,总结了支持向量机和免疫算法的运行流程和关键算法。然后,用改进的免疫算法优化支持向量机惩罚因子、松弛变量及核函数参数。某型航空发动机的油液铁谱分析数据和加入噪声数据验证结果表明,该方法可有效实现航空发动机磨损故障诊断且具有较好的鲁棒性。最后,研究了核函数、多分类决策方法、初始种群大小、亲和力计算公式、支持向量机优化方法和归一化方法对磨损故障诊断准确率的影响,得到了最佳诊断方法。 相似文献
92.
《Advances in Space Research (includes Cospar's Information Bulletin, Space Research Today)》2023,71(1):946-963
In this paper, we implement the AdaBoost algorithm to optimize the classifications results of precipitations intensities carried out by One versus All strategy using Support Vector Machine (OvA-SVM). The model developed which combines the AdaBoost algorithm with a multiclass SVM is applied to images from the MSG (Meteosat Second Generation) satellite. Other variants to build multiclass SVMs, such as the OvO-SVM (One versus One SVM), SBT-SVM (Slant Binary Tree SVM) and DDAG-SVM (Decision Directed Acyclic Graph) are also implemented on which we tested the AdaBoost algorithm. The study showed that the AdaBoost algorithm performed better in the case of the OvA-SVM variant compared to the other variants.In order to evaluate the elaborated model, some classification techniques, such as the ECST Enhanced Convective Stratiform Technique (ECST), the SART where the Support vector machine, Artificial neural network and Random forest classifiers are combined, the Convective/Stratiform Rain Area Delineation Technique (CS-RADT) and the Random Forest technique (RFT) are applied. The classification results obtained show that AdaBoost with OvA-SVM (AdaOvA-SVM) presents very interesting performances where the evaluation parameters POD, POFD, FAR, BIAS, CSI and PC indicate the values 95.2%, 12.4%, 14.7%, 0.9, 88.1% and 96.5% respectively. Indeed, the AdaOvA-SVM technique has surpassed the CS-RADT, ECST and RFT techniques. As for the comparison with the SART, we noted that OvA-SVM presents very close results. The same trend was also observed when estimating precipitation. At the end of this study, it is shown that the AdaBoost algorithm performs better on a weak classifier or on a strong classifier operating in an unfavorable environment. 相似文献