周向总压畸变对多级轴流压气机稳定性影响的逐级模拟方法

介绍了1种分析进口总压畸变对多级轴流压气机特性影响的逐级模拟方法。应用该方法对J85-13压气机的进口总压畸变进行了分析,并对压气机在稳态和畸变情况下特性的逐级模拟计算结果进行了详细的数值分析,讨论了压气机的失稳关键级以及有效进气攻角对多级轴流压气机特性的影响。计算结果与试验结果的比较表明,该模拟方法是合理可行的。     

面向复杂产品开发项目的动态组织元模型

针对复杂产品开发项目的组织建模问题,提出一个完备的动态产品开发组织元模型.模型整合了人员、能力角色、权限角色及功能组4个类型.与其他组织模型的不同之处在于:在该模型中,角色按用途分为能力角色类和权限角色类,而职位作为能力角色的一个子类不在模型中出现;通过在模型中引入分类器,使该模型支持能力角色、功能组及权限角色的分类建模.利用该模型,产品开发组织定义人员可任意地、快速地建立产品开发组织.     

精密装配对空空导弹位标器影响的研究

通过对其自主稳定回路及间隙描述函数频率特性的分析,对间隙装配调试及检测技术提出改进措施,并设计了测隙装置,完善了装配工艺.     

一种用于主动流动控制的气泡型微致动器

 面向先进主动流动控制,在国内率先研发了一种基于微机电系统(MEMS)的气泡型微致动器阵列技术。分析了气泡型微致动器用于主动流动控制的原理,阐述了致动器结构及其加工工艺。通过对气泡样件的压力载荷 变形行为的测试,表明其具有较好的线性和较大承载能力。结合不同翼型的风洞试验表明,微致动器作动可以影响翼型表面的压强分布,从而可用于增升等控制目的。     

航空发动机双转子系统的拍振分析

 在双转子航空发动机中,由于转子系统不可避免地存在不平衡量,当两个转子的转速比较接近时,发动机会出现拍振现象,拍振将引起振动强度过大问题。对双转子系统的拍振进行了研究,分析了拍振的周期性、信号强度及其反向转子特性,阐明了拍振产生的机理和特征,并采用数值仿真和试验对拍振进行了定量分析和验证。研究表明,拍振与双转子转速差和不平衡量的相位因素有关,当转速差小于工作转速的20%时,双转子系统拍振信号的强度较大。     

空间相机相对辐射定标精度分析

文章介绍了CCD相机辐射定标概念;分析对比了平均行标准差法、平均标准差法和广义噪声法三种计算相对辐射定标精度的算法;对归一化系数法、最小二乘法进行相对定标的数学原理进行了介绍;并采用中巴地球资源卫星02B CCD相机辐射定标数据计算三种定标精度,验证了理论分析的正确性,并指出了现有定义算法的不足处。     

飞艇的信息战应用研究

飞艇广泛应用于预警、侦察、通讯、干扰等信息对抗领域,具有传统航空器无法取代的优势.分析了飞艇的信息化作战应用和国外的技术现状,并在此基础上,讨论了飞艇信息战应用的发展趋势和所涉及的一系列关键技术.     

拦截高速目标的比例与反比例导引捕获区分析

针对拦截高速目标的作战特点,分析了比例导引(PN)与反比例导引(RPN)的捕获区。首先,通过分析拦截弹与目标的相对运动关系,推导得到了顺轨和逆轨的零控拦截条件,此条件由目标和拦截弹的速度前置角以及二者速度比确定;其次,以拦截弹和目标速度前置角为坐标系,推导得到了PN以及RPN捕获区以及各自导航比设置范围。PN的捕获区由逆轨零控拦截条件以及与其相切且斜率为1/(N-1)的两条直线构成,RPN的捕获区由顺轨零控拦截条件以及与其相切且斜率为1/(-N-1)的两条直线构成;然后,利用函数对称性将PN与RPN捕获区转换到同一坐标区间,得到了相同条件下RPN捕获区要大于PN捕获区的结论;最后,开展了四种情形下的仿真,验证了本文捕获区分析的合理性及有效性。     

GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients

The GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) monthly gravity models have been independently produced and published by several research institutions, such as Center for Space Research (CSR), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS). According to their processing standards, above institutions use the traditional variational approach except that the DEOS exploits the acceleration approach. The background force models employed are rather similar. The produced gravity field models generally agree with one another in the spatial pattern. However, there are some discrepancies in the gravity signal amplitude between solutions produced by different institutions. In particular, 10%–30% signal amplitude differences in some river basins can be observed. In this paper, we implemented a variant of the traditional variational approach and computed two sets of monthly gravity field solutions using the data from January 2005 to December 2006. The input data are K-band range-rates (KBRR) and kinematic orbits of GRACE satellites. The main difference in the production of our two types of models is how to deal with nuisance parameters. This type of parameters is necessary to absorb low-frequency errors in the data, which are mainly the aliasing and instrument errors. One way is to remove the nuisance parameters before estimating the geopotential coefficients, called NPARB approach in the paper. The other way is to estimate the nuisance parameters and geopotential coefficients simultaneously, called NPESS approach. These two types of solutions mainly differ in geopotential coefficients from degree 2 to 5. This can be explained by the fact that the nuisance parameters and the gravity field coefficients are highly correlated, particularly at low degrees. We compare these solutions with the official and published ones by means of spectral analysis. It is found that our solutions are, in general, consistent with others in the spatial pattern. The water storage variations of the Amazon, Chari and Ganges river basins have also been computed. The variations computed with the NPARB approach are closer to those produced by JPL and DEOS solutions, while the variations produced with the NPESS approach are in good agreement with those produced by the CSR and GFZ solutions. A simulation study is implemented with considering realistic noise and low-frequency error. The two approaches are used to recover the true model. The NPESS solution appears closer to the true one. Therefore we are inclined to estimate the nuisance parameters simultaneously with the geopential coefficients.