具有层次结构的模糊决策

本文将AHP的层次结构引入模糊决策中,建立了具有层次结构的模糊决策模型,从而避免了因将模糊判断引入AHP中而产生的某些困难,并将之试用于简化了的飞机成本分析。     

大型空间环模设备液氮系统冷箱设计

液氮系统是大型空间环境模拟设备中的主要分系统之一,液氮流程采用了单相密闭循环、文丘利管、液氮泵增压及阀门冷箱的结构方案。文章重点介绍了阀门冷箱的设计,这是近年来国外大型空间模拟器液氮流程发展的新趋势。     

非合作式自主交会对接的终端接近模糊控制

研究了非合作式自主交会对接（AR＆D）的终端接近问题。文中根据视线相对运动方程，设计了一个模糊控制器来实现终端接近制导。通过选择合适的模糊输入变量，设计了三个通道独立的模糊规则库。用乘积推理机、单值模糊器和中心平均解模糊公式获得模糊控制器输出。最后，本文用精确的轨道模型进行了数值仿真，验证了该模糊控制器是可行的，该控制器满足非合作式自主交会对接终端接近的高精度、安全无碰撞的要求。     

Real-time studies on microalgae under microgravity

Using remote sensing technique, we investigated real-time Nostoc sphaeroides Kütz (Cyanobacterium) in Closed System under microgravity by SHENZHOU-2 spacecraft in January 2001. The experiments had 1 g centrifuges in space for control and ground control group experiments were also carried out in the same equipments and under the same controlled condition. The data about the population growth of Nostoc sp. of experiments and temperature changes of system were got from spacecraft every minute. From the data, we can find that population growth of Nostoc sp. in microgravity group was higher than that of other groups in space or on ground, even though both the control 1 g group in space and 1 g group on ground indicated same increasing characteristics in experiments. The growth rate of 1.4 g group (centrifuged group on ground) was also promoted during experiment. The temperature changes of systems are also affected by gravity and light. Some aspects about those differences were discussed. From the discussion of these results during experiment, it can be found that gravity is the major factor to lead to these changes.     

原子氧环境效应的地面模拟技术

系统论述了原子氧和航天器表面常用聚合物材料反应的微观机理,并从宏观角度对这些材料的性能进行了评估。同时也总结了国外在原子氧防护技术研究方面所取得的最新成果。     

空间碎片环境与航天器可靠性

文章介绍了空间碎片环境、空间碎片对航天器可靠性的影响、空间碎片地面模拟试验技术,以及空间碎片的防护技术。     

塔尔寺的“三绝”艺术

塔尔寺始建于明嘉靖三十九年（1560年）．到万历五年（1577年）初具规模。整个寺院依山势而建．由众多殿宇．经堂，佛塔．僧舍等组成．布局严谨．建筑巍峨金碧辉煌．气势恢宏．是我国名的藏传佛教格鲁派六大寺院之一。除了历史和建筑塔尔寺的酥油花．壁画、堆绣从题材内容到艺术风格、工艺水平皆超过了其发源地而居雪域各寺之冠．闻名于海内外被誉为塔尔寺“三绝”。     

Characterizing slope correction methods applied to satellite radar altimetry data: A case study around Dome Argus in East Antarctica

Slope correction is important to improve the accuracy of satellite radar elevation measurements by mitigating the slope-induced error (SE), especially over uneven ground surfaces. Although several slope correction methods have been proposed, guidance in the form of stepwise algorithm on how to implement these methods in processing radar altimetric data at the coding level, and the differences among these methods need to be presented and discussed systematically. In this paper, three existing types of slope correction methods—the direct method (DM), intermediate method (IM), and relocation method (RM, further divided into RM1 and RM2)—are described in detail. In addition, their main differences and features for various scientific applications are analyzed. We conduct a systematic experiment with CryoSat-2 Low Resolution Mode (LRM) data in a physically stable area around Dome Argus in East Antarctica, where in-situ measurements were available for comparison. The slope correction is implemented separately using the three methods, with the latest high-accuracy Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica (REMA) as the a-priori topography model. The bias and precision of the slope-corrected CryoSat-2 data results from the RM2 is ?0.18 ± 0.86 m based on the comparison with the field Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data. The results from the RM2 indicate higher precision compared to those from the RM1. According to the correlation analysis of the slope-corrected CryoSat-2 data results (RM1 and RM2), the bias enlarges and the precision becomes worse when the surface slope increases from 0 to 0.85°. After a comprehensively comparative analysis, we find that the results from the RM1 and RM2 are superior in precision (0.93 m and 0.86 m) with respect to the GNSS data. The relatively low precision (1.22 m) from the IM is due to the potential error from the a-priori digital elevation model (DEM). The DM has the lowest precision (2.66 m). Another experiment over rough topography in West Antarctica is carried out for comparison, especially between the RM1 (precision of 15.27 m) and RM2 (precision of 16.25 m). In general, the RM is recommended for the SE elimination among the three methods. Moreover, the RM2 is firstly considered over smooth topography due to the superior performance in bias and precision, while the RM1 is more suggested over the rough topography because of the slightly smaller bias and better precision. The IM relies much on the accuracy of the a-prior DEM and is not usually recommended, because of the strict requirement in the sampling time between the radar altimetry data and the a-priori DEM to avoid any surface change over time.