模糊自整定PID控制及其在航天产品真空热试验中的应用分析

文章首先分析了航天产品热试验时被控对象的特点,并进行了建模分析,接着介绍了如何通过参数自整定技术获得PID的3个初始参数,并进行了模糊自校正PID控制器设计。为了检验该控制方法的控制效果,文章选取了3次有代表性的试验数据进行了仿真分析。结果表明,模糊自校正PID控制方法具有适应性强、控制精度高、抑制试验系统温度滞后明显的优点,该方法较原控制方法超调量有所减小,过渡过程有所加快,抗干扰能力显著增强,较好地解决了控制系统快速性和小超调量之间的矛盾。     

基于强化学习的在轨目标逼近

从强化学习的角度,对在轨目标逼近问题进行研究,设计了一种整合制导与控制的端到端的算法.首先对在轨目标逼近问题进行数学建模;然后对强化学习算法原理进行简介,根据问题特点分析不同强化学习框架的优劣,确定以DDPG作为算法框架,并设计了基于强化学习的在轨目标逼近算法;最后通过仿真验证,分析了基于强化学习逼近算法的优劣性.     

弹道导弹突防中的相参干扰

分析了相参干扰相对于噪声干扰的优缺点.在此基础上,针对弹道导弹突防的特殊应用,对相参干扰的反应时间设计、假目标密度设计以及多目标的干扰问题展开了分析研究,得出了一些有益的结论.     

微纳聚合体卫星的对称式重构规划算法

为解决微纳聚合体卫星变构过程中,聚合体各部分之间的动力学耦合导致的卫星整体姿态翻转或紊乱,提出了一种对称式变构规划算法。首先建立了铰链约束下的漂浮基多刚体系统动力学模型,研究了重构过程中各运动模块对本体姿态的影响,提出当每两个运动模块位置与转动方向满足对称性条件时,两者对本体姿态的影响可在一定程度上相互抵消。基于上述理论,在A*算法中引入最优分配度量和对称性判定,设计了并行对称重构规划算法。仿真结果表明,该规划算法可实现重构过程中多模块并行、对称运动,重构过程总步数较少,运动模块对本体姿态的影响小。     

并行组合扩频通信系统变换域干扰抑制技术研究

为提高并行组合扩频通信系统抵抗窄带干扰的能力,研究自适应多门限和DT-FCME两种变换域算法抑制并行组合扩频通信系统中窄带干扰的问题。经仿真验证,两种算法能够对系统中高斯白噪声环境下的多种窄带干扰起到较好的抑制效果。最后对比分析了两种算法抑制不同类型窄带干扰时的优缺点。     

等离子鞘套热力学波动对电磁波传播的影响

针对等离子鞘套热力学波动造成电磁波传播特性变化的问题,结合湍流理论、等离子理论和电磁波传播理论,得到了热力学参数波动与介电常数间的关系。计算了不同状态下热力学参数波动引起S和Ka波段电磁波透射和反射系数的变化。结果表明,当电子密度增大,S波段反射系数变化减小、透射系数变化增大;当Ka波段在碰撞频率10MHz时,反射系数变化增大、透射系数变化减小,在碰撞频率1GHz和50GHz时透射系数变化反射系数变化先增后减。不同高度下波动的影响也不同,S波段透射和反射系数变化随高度升高先减后增;Ka波段透射系数变化先减后增、反射系数变化先减后增而后再次减小。因此,应根据实际环境状态获得波动的包络范围,进而针对性开展测控通信系统设计。     

用激光干涉技术测量转速的研究

叙述了一种新型转速激光干涉测量方法,详细分析了这种方法的工作原理,确定了本测量方法的转速测量范围,给出了实验结果。     

先进的宇航试验舱温控系统

介绍了中国新一代宇航试验舱的温控系统。该温控系统设计思想先进、结构新颖。在直径２．３ｍ,长２ｍ的封闭舱体控温面上,实现了０℃～５０℃的任意温度定点控制及９０ｍｉｎ内的正弦波、梯形波、三角波的周期变化;在整个控温面上温度非均匀性（均方根偏差）小于０．３℃,远远超过了非均匀度±１℃、控制精度±２℃的原设计指标。     

静压气浮轴承工程设计方法研究

静压气浮轴承是惯性器件测试平台回转支撑轴系的关键部件,其承载能力和回转精度对惯性器件测试的准确性有着重要的影响,目前,静压气浮轴承设计、计算过程复杂,为提高设计效率,简化设计方法,在满足静压气浮轴承性能的条件下,推导了静压气浮轴承工程计算公式,在此基础上,设计了一款双向止推空气轴承,确定了几何参数,计算了空气静压径向轴承、空气静压止推轴承的轴承承载力、刚度、耗气量及摩擦力矩,并与有限元仿真结果进行了对比分析,验证了该设计方法的有效性。     

GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients

The GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) monthly gravity models have been independently produced and published by several research institutions, such as Center for Space Research (CSR), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS). According to their processing standards, above institutions use the traditional variational approach except that the DEOS exploits the acceleration approach. The background force models employed are rather similar. The produced gravity field models generally agree with one another in the spatial pattern. However, there are some discrepancies in the gravity signal amplitude between solutions produced by different institutions. In particular, 10%–30% signal amplitude differences in some river basins can be observed. In this paper, we implemented a variant of the traditional variational approach and computed two sets of monthly gravity field solutions using the data from January 2005 to December 2006. The input data are K-band range-rates (KBRR) and kinematic orbits of GRACE satellites. The main difference in the production of our two types of models is how to deal with nuisance parameters. This type of parameters is necessary to absorb low-frequency errors in the data, which are mainly the aliasing and instrument errors. One way is to remove the nuisance parameters before estimating the geopotential coefficients, called NPARB approach in the paper. The other way is to estimate the nuisance parameters and geopotential coefficients simultaneously, called NPESS approach. These two types of solutions mainly differ in geopotential coefficients from degree 2 to 5. This can be explained by the fact that the nuisance parameters and the gravity field coefficients are highly correlated, particularly at low degrees. We compare these solutions with the official and published ones by means of spectral analysis. It is found that our solutions are, in general, consistent with others in the spatial pattern. The water storage variations of the Amazon, Chari and Ganges river basins have also been computed. The variations computed with the NPARB approach are closer to those produced by JPL and DEOS solutions, while the variations produced with the NPESS approach are in good agreement with those produced by the CSR and GFZ solutions. A simulation study is implemented with considering realistic noise and low-frequency error. The two approaches are used to recover the true model. The NPESS solution appears closer to the true one. Therefore we are inclined to estimate the nuisance parameters simultaneously with the geopential coefficients.