An innovative approach for distributed and integrated resources planning for the Space Station Freedom

The widely distributed nature of the Space Station Freedom program, plus continuous multi-year operations will force program planners to develop innovative planning concepts. The traditional centralized planning operation will not be adequate. It will be replaced by multiple small planning centers working within guidelines issued by a central planning authority. Plans will not be optimized; rather, operating efficiency and user flexibility will be blended to satisfy program goals. The key to this new approach is the application of new planning methodologies and system development technologies to accommodate distributed resources that must be integrated. Resources will be distributed to the multiple planning entities in such a way that, when the several plans are built and then integrated, they will fit together with minimal modification. The plan itself will be an envelope schedule containing resource limits and constraint boundaries within which users will be free to make choices of the specific activities they will execute, up to the time of execution. Some level of margin within program guidelines will be built in to allow for variation and unforeseen change. This paper presents the authors' recommended planning approach and cites two NASA systems being developed that will utilize these resource distribution/integration planning concepts, methodologies and development technologies.     

Is it a plane?

An international colloquium on the Spaceplane and the Law was organized by the French Society for Air and and Space Law, with the help of the European Space Agency, the French Civil Aviation Authority, the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and Air France, and had ICAO, Eurocontrol and the French Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Transport, PTT and Research as its patrons. The purpose of the colloquium was to create awareness of the legal problems that may arise when spaceplanes become reality, and to propose solutions to those problems. The colloquium was held in Paris on 14–15 May 1991.     

Australia''s space heritage

An overview is provided of Australian space activities and their legacy, including the Woomera launch centre, tracking stations, space science, technology and applications. The military basis for many of the larger activities is discussed and the importance of using space-based remote sensing to deal with mounting global problems is emphasized.     

含孔边裂纹各向异性有限板的二维问题

应用边界元法,并结合一种特殊的复变函数基本解,研究了含孔边裂纹的各向异性有限板的应力强度因子修正系数的计算。这种特解边界元法避免了在裂纹附近划分单元,可以获得较好的数值计算精度。通过算例分析,结果表明本方法精度高,运算量小,具有一定的工程应用价值。     

Is the presence of oxygen on an exoplanet a reliable biosignature?

We revisit the validity of the presence of O(2) or O(3) in the atmosphere of a rocky planet as being a biosignature. Up to now, the false positive that has been identified applies to a planet during a hot greenhouse runaway, which is restricted to planets outside the habitable zone (HZ) of the star that are closer to the star. In this paper, we explore a new possibility based on abiotic photogeneration of O(2) at the surface of a planet that could occur inside the HZ. The search for such a process is an active field of laboratory investigation that has resulted from an ongoing interest in finding efficient systems with the capacity to harvest solar energy on Earth. Although such a process is energetically viable, we find it to be a very unlikely explanation for the observation of O(2) or O(3) in the atmosphere of a telluric exoplanet in the HZ. It requires an efficient photocatalyst to be present and abundant under natural planetary conditions, which appears unlikely according to our discussion of known mineral photochemical processes. In contrast, a biological system that synthesizes its constituents from abundant raw materials and energy has the inherent adaptation advantage to become widespread and dominant (Darwinist argument). Thus, O(2) appears to continue to be a good biosignature.     

一种基于不对称再入体的制导与控制方法研究

研究一种不对称再入体的再入机动控制方法.不对称再入体气动外形简单,它的升力大小一般不可控,但可通过滚动控制调整升力的方向实现机动飞行.为实现不对称再入体的精确制导,本文研究了一种滚速可调的“滚转制导律”,通过调整制导系数,可以兼顾再入体滚动角速度和落点精度的要求;设计了不对称再人体滚动通道的喷流控制方案,给出了滚动姿态...     

双立尾/三角翼布局的立尾抖振研究

在北航的风洞中进行了双立尾-三角翼布局的立尾抖振实验,目的是研究立尾抖振产生的原因.主要采用了激光测振仪测立尾加速度和动态压力传感器测立尾表面的动态压力的实验方法.实验结果表明在旋涡破裂以后,立尾上就会产生强烈的抖振.抖振是由立尾上表面压力的周期性脉动造成的.对机翼和立尾表面的压力频谱分析表明,立尾上的压力脉动来源于机翼前旋涡破裂流中的螺旋波.对于本实验使用的模型来说,当机翼迎角α=0°~20°范围,由于流动是附着流和涡流,所以立尾没有明显抖振;当机翼迎角在α=20°~56°范围,立尾处在破裂涡流的范围,立尾抖振明显,并且抖振强度在35°~50°之间达到最大.因此,三角翼破裂涡流中的螺旋波正是双立尾产生抖振的主要原因.     

Sc在L10-TiAl金属间化合物中占位的理论研究

基于密度泛函理论,运用第一原理赝势平面波方法,采用CASTEP量子力学能量软件包研究了Sc占据Ti位与Sc占据A l位的超胞晶格常数、原子形成热、超胞总态密度与电子密度差分图,两种情况对比下,在L10-TiA l合金中,Sc优先占据Ti位,这一结论为进一步研究三元系TiA l-Sc合金提供了理论研究的基础。     

Ballistics, navigation, and motion control for a spacecraft during its landing on the surface of Phobos

Basic concepts and algorithms laid as foundations of the scheme of landing on the Martian moon Phobos (developed for the Phobos-Grunt project) are presented. The conditions ensuring the landing are discussed. Algorithms of onboard navigation and control are described. The equations of spacecraft motion with respect to Phobos are considered, as well as their use for correction of the spacecraft motion. The algorithm of estimation of the spacecraft’s state vector using measurements with a laser altimeter and Doppler meter of velocity and distance is presented. A system for modeling the landing with a firmware complex including a prototype of the onboard computer is described.     

Ares I–X Flight Test Vehicle similitude to the Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle

The Ares I–X Flight Test Vehicle is the first in a series of flight test vehicles that will take the Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle design from development to operational capability. Ares I–X is scheduled for a 2009 flight date, early enough in the Ares I design and development process so that data obtained from the flight can impact the design of Ares I before its Critical Design Review. Decisions on Ares I–X scope, flight test objectives, and FTV fidelity were made prior to the Ares I systems requirements being baselined. This was necessary in order to achieve a development flight test to impact the Ares I design. Differences between the Ares I–X and the Ares I configurations are artifacts of formulating this experimental project at an early stage and the natural maturation of the Ares I design process. This paper describes the similarities and differences between the Ares I–X Flight Test Vehicle and the Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle. Areas of comparison include the outer mold line geometry, aerosciences, trajectory, structural modes, flight control architecture, separation sequence, and relevant element differences. Most of the outer mold line differences present between Ares I and Ares I–X are minor and will not have a significant effect on overall vehicle performance. The most significant impacts are related to the geometric differences in Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle at the forward end of the stack. These physical differences will cause differences in the flow physics in these areas. Even with these differences, the Ares I–X flight test is poised to meet all five primary objectives and six secondary objectives. Knowledge of what the Ares I–X flight test will provide in similitude to Ares I—as well as what the test will not provide—is important in the continued execution of the Ares I–X mission leading to its flight and the continued design and development of Ares I.