共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
2.
浅析航天器的污染及其控制 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:2
在校准真空规时发现,即使采用无油真空抽气系统,来自航天器和空间环境模拟试验设备的污染依然严峻.文章分析了污染源和污染对航天器的影响,建议尽快制定污染控制标准和研制相应设备. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
真空热环境试验新型不锈钢结构热沉
加工工艺研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
热沉是空间环境模拟真空热试验设备的重要组成部分,其功能是为航天器进行真空热试验提供冷黑环境。在国内以往的空间环境模拟试验设备中,热沉多采用铝结构、铜结构或不锈钢-铜翅片结构。不锈钢热沉是新型的热沉结构形式,具有良好的真空低温性能。文章对不锈钢板式热沉的结构和加工工艺进行了研究探索,在经过大量焊接加工与试验分析的基础上,总结出一套不锈钢热沉的加工工艺技术。 相似文献
6.
大型空间环境模拟试验设备的液氮系统能否顺利启动是决定液氮系统设计成败的一个关键的问题.文章提出了影响单相密闭循环液氮系统启动的两个关键因素,以及如何在液氮系统设计中加以解决.通过初步调试证明,液氮系统能够很好地解决大型空间环境模拟设备液氮系统启动困难的问题. 相似文献
7.
空间辐射环境单粒子效应研究 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
文章介绍了空间辐射环境对航天器电子元器件产生的单粒子效应的国内外研究情况,从环境模拟方法、模拟试验设备、单粒子效应及防护以及飞行试验等方面进行了分析比较。文章对国内研究发展提出了一些建设性的建议。 相似文献
8.
针对航天型号研制生产的现状,分析了航天型号进度控制的原理,介绍了航天型号进度控制的流程和方法,深入分析了当前进度管理中存在的问题,并结合项目管理理论提出了解决这些问题的总体思路和相应的调整措施。对及时推广和应用先进型号进度控制方法,推动航天型号的持续高速发展具有重要的现实意义。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
风险管理是航天计划/项目管理中的重要组成部分,并已在国外的航天型号研制中受到重视.文章介绍了国外在航天项目中对风险管理的要求和风险管理过程,同时着重介绍了风险管理在环境试验工作中的应用实例. 相似文献
13.
论航天型号项目的协作及项目群的管理 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
文章主要针对我国航天型号项目管理中存在的问题进行分析和研究。例如在大型环境试验和总装过程中,单一项目的管理已经日臻完善;但面对更加繁重的任务和巨大的发展机遇,单一项目的管理所暴露出的问题也越发明显。文章拟用项目群的管理思路来完善和丰富项目管理体系,从而促进环境试验和总装的项目管理水平。 相似文献
14.
国外某航天企业项目管理模式探讨 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
分析了国外某航天企业的项目管理模式及其主要的管理组织结构和职能,指出项目管理能力已经成为衡量航天企业综合能力的重要标志,结合该企业先进的经验,讨论了目前国内航天院所项目管理现状的不足,并提出了提高相关项目管理能力和管理成熟度的建议。 相似文献
15.
航天项目资源效用提升方法思考 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
文章根据价值工程的管理思想,以提升我国航天项目价值为最终目标,在航天系统工程技术和项目管理的基础上,从资源配置和使用角度对项目最优价值的实现过程进行了项目资源管理实践的总结,得出通过资源效用提升可以更好地实现项目价值的结论,较为系统地提出了航天项目资源效用提升的有效实施方法。 相似文献
16.
系统生命周期是空间项目管理和系统工程方法的基本概念之一。系统生命周期被划分为若干研制阶段,目的是分阶段对整个研制过程进行管理,循序渐进地实现整体目标。研制程序体现了认识逐步深化的科学规律。建立功能基线、分配基线和产品基线,是空间项目管理的共识。 相似文献
17.
《Acta Astronautica》2007,60(4-7):588-593
The paper discusses concepts about the role of architecture in the design of space habitats and the development of a general evaluation criteria of architectural design contribution. Besides the existing feasibility studies, the general requisites, the development studies, and the critical design review which are mainly based on the experience of human space missions and the standards of the NASA-STD-3000 manual and which analyze and evaluate the relation between man and environment and between man and machine mainly in its functionality, there is very few material about design of comfort and wellbeing of man in space habitat. Architecture for space habitat means the design of an artificial environment with much comfort in an “atmosphere” of wellbeing. These are mainly psychological effects of human factors which are very important in the case of a long time space mission. How can the degree of comfort and “wellbeing atmosphere” in an artificial environment be measured? How can the quality of the architectural contribution in space design be quantified? Definition of a criteria catalogue to reach a larger objectivity in architectural design evaluation. Definition of constant parameters as a result of project necessities to quantify the quality of the design. Architectural design analysis due the application and verification within the parameters and consequently overlapping and evaluating results. Interdisciplinary work between architects, astronautics, engineers, psychologists, etc. All the disciplines needed for planning a high quality habitat for humans in space. Analysis of the principles of well designed artificial environment. Good quality design for space architecture is the result of the interaction and interrelation between many different project necessities (technological, environmental, human factors, transportation, costs, etc.). Each of this necessities is interrelated in the design project and cannot be evaluated on its own. Therefore, the design process needs constant check ups to choose each time the best solution in relation to the whole. As well as for the main disciplines around human factors, architectural design for space has to be largely tested to produce scientific improvement. 相似文献
18.
《Space Policy》2014,30(4):215-222
Although existing international instruments such as the Outer Space Treaty and Moon Agreement generally express sentiments for minimizing missions' extraterrestrial environmental impacts, they tend to be limited in scope, vague and generally unenforceable. There is no formal structure for assessing how and to what extent we affect those environments, no opportunity for public participation, no uniform protocol for documenting and registering the effects of our actions and no requirement to mitigate adverse impacts or take them into consideration in the decision-making process. Except for precautions limiting forward biological contamination and issues related to Earth satellites, environmental impact analysis, when done at all, remains focused on how missions affect the Earth and near-Earth environments, not how our actions affect the Moon, Mars, Europa, comets and other potential destinations. Extraterrestrial environmental impacts are potentially counterproductive to future space exploration, exploitation and scientific investigations. Clear, consistent and effective international protocols guiding a process for assessing such impacts are warranted. While instruments such as the US National Environmental Policy Act provide legally tested and efficient regulatory models that can guide impact assessment here on Earth, statutory legal frameworks may not work as well in the international environment of outer space. A proposal for industry-driven standards and an environmental code of conduct based, in part, on best management practices are offered for consideration. 相似文献