| 跨音速涡轮叶栅三种试验方法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨雪珍.跨音速涡轮叶栅三种试验方法的比较[J].航空动力学报,1987,2(2):105-108,184. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨雪珍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 燃气涡轮研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文简单介绍了三套典型的跨音速涡轮叶栅的设计。比较了叶栅几何相似条件下进行的扇形环形叶栅、平面吹风、气水比拟三种试验方法所获得的结果,同时还与“时间推进有限面积法”的数值计算作了对比。对这三种试验手段的优缺点和可靠程度进行了初步评价。
|
| 收稿时间： | 8/1/1986 12:00:00 AM |
COMPARISON OF THREE EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR TRANSONIC TURBINE CASCADES |
| |
| Yang Xuezhen.COMPARISON OF THREE EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR TRANSONIC TURBINE CASCADES[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,1987,2(2):105-108,184. |
| |
| Authors: | Yang Xuezhen |
| |
| Institution: | Gas Turbine Establishment |
| |
| Abstract: | Three typical transonis turbine cascades have been designed for this purpose and tested with the aid of three different methods(two-dimensional cascade wind tunnel test, wind tunnel test with sector of annular cascade,and hydraulic analogy). The results of these three methods are compared under the condition of geometry similarity. They are also compared with numerical solutions of the Finite Area Time Marching calculation. The strong and weak points and reliability of these methods are evaluated preliminarily. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《航空动力学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《航空动力学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
