首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


On the stability of spinning satellites
Authors:Frank L Janssens  Jozef C van der Ha
Institution:1. 2201 KA Noordwijk, the Netherlands;2. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China;3. Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China;4. Institute for Nutritional Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China;6. Bio-X Center, Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.;1. MSACT Research & Consulting, 34 Maritime Court, Exeter EX2 8GP, UK;2. Particulate Fluids Processing Centre, Dept of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia;3. ICI Research & Technology, The Wilton Centre, Redcar TS10 4RF, UK
Abstract:We study the directional stability of rigid and deformable spinning satellites in terms of two attitude angles. The linearized attitude motion of a free system about an assumed uniform-spin reference solution leads to a generic MGK system when the satellite is rigid or deformable. In terms of Lyapunov’s stability theory, we investigate the stability with respect to a subset of the variables. For a rigid body, the MGK system is 6-dimensional, i.e., 3 rotational and 3 translational variables. When flexible parts are present the system can have any arbitrary dimension. The 2×2 McIntyre–Myiagi stability matrix gives sufficient conditions for the attitude stability. A further development of this method has led to the Equivalent Rigid Body method. We propose an alternative practical method to establish sufficiency conditions for directional stability by using the Frobenius–Schur reduction formula. As practical applications we discuss a spinning satellite augmented with a spring–mass system and a rigid body appended with two cables and tip masses. In practice, the attitude stability must also be investigated when the spinning satellite is subject to a constant axial thrust. The generic format becomes MGKN as the thrust is a follower force. For a perfectly aligned thrust along the spin axis, Lyapunov’s indirect method remains valid also when deformable parts are present. We illustrate this case with an apogee motor burn in the presence of slag. When the thrust is not on the spin axis or not pointing parallel to the spin axis, the uniform-spin reference motion does not exist and none of the previous methods is applicable. In this case, the linearization may be performed about the initial state. Even when the linearized system has bounded solutions, the non-linear system can be unstable in general. We illustrate this situation by an instability that actually happened in-flight during a station-keeping maneuver of ESA’s GEOS-I satellite in 1979.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号