| 不同湍流预混燃烧模型在本生灯火焰中的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 韩 超,张 培,叶桃红,陈义良.不同湍流预混燃烧模型在本生灯火焰中的比较[J].推进技术,2014,35(8):1086-1093. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 韩 超 张 培 叶桃红 陈义良 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学技术大学 热科学与能源工程系,安徽 合肥 230027;中国科学技术大学 热科学与能源工程系,安徽 合肥 230027;中国科学技术大学 热科学与能源工程系,安徽 合肥 230027;中国科学技术大学 热科学与能源工程系,安徽 合肥 230027 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金(51176178)；国家自然科学重点基金(50936005)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 湍流预混燃烧的大涡模拟数值计算近来受到很大的关注,为了进一步发展湍流预混燃烧模型,利用正在发展的湍流预混燃烧模型等值面集合的G函数方法、层流预混火焰生成流型的化学热力学建表FGM方法、G函数/FGM耦合方法三种燃烧模型,对甲烷/空气湍流本生灯火焰进行了大涡模拟计算,并对上述燃烧模型进行了比较。大涡模拟结果表明,G函数方法能够较为准确捕捉火焰的传播特性,FGM方法能够捕捉到火焰和湍流的相互作用,但无法准确预测火焰的传播特性。而耦合的方法既可以捕捉火焰的传播特性,又能够捕捉到火焰和湍流的相互作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 湍流预混火焰 本生灯火焰 G函数 火焰面数据库 |
| 收稿时间： | 8/7/2013 12:00:00 AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2013/9/25 0:00:00 |
A Comparison of Three Different Turbulent Premixed Combustion Models in Busen Flames |
| |
| HAN Chao,ZHANG Pei,YE Tao-hong and CHEN Yi-liang.A Comparison of Three Different Turbulent Premixed Combustion Models in Busen Flames[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2014,35(8):1086-1093. |
| |
| Authors: | HAN Chao ZHANG Pei YE Tao-hong and CHEN Yi-liang |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China;Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China;Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China;Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Turbulent premixed combustion modeling in large eddy simulation(LES)has attracted a lot of attention. In order to develop turbulent combustion model,in this work,three combustion models including G-equation,flamelet generated manifolds(FGM)method and the coupled G-FGM method were applied to simulate the turbulent methane/air Busen flame using LES. The predictions of these models were compared in detail. The results indicate that G-equation method could capture the flame propagation precisely. FMG method takes the interaction of turbulence and flame into consideration but cannot predict the flame propagation exactly. The coupled levelset/FGM method could have both advantages so that it has potential applications. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《推进技术》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《推进技术》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
