首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验
引用本文:卫凯,徐琛,燕群,徐健,王龙.旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验[J].航空动力学报,2023,38(4):949-954.
作者姓名:卫凯  徐琛  燕群  徐健  王龙
作者单位:1.中国航空工业集团有限公司 中国飞机强度研究所航空声学与振动航空科技重点实验室,西安 710065
基金项目:工业和信息化部资助项目(MJZ-2016-F-11)
摘    要:为了验证旋转桨叶表面压力的反演计算方法,搭建了旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验平台,对一套二叶螺旋桨的表面压力开展了反演试验。通过传声器阵列测量螺旋桨的远场噪声,利用Kulite压力传感器和离线式采集器测量桨叶表面的静压,并与计算结果进行对比。结果表明:在所研究的工况范围内,计算结果与试验结果吻合较好,趋势基本一致;其中两个测点的试验结果与计算结果误差在1%以内,精度很高;另两个测点的对比差值较大,主要是压力传感器安装工艺误差所导致的。

关 键 词:旋转桨叶  表面压力  压力反演  远场噪声  试验测量
收稿时间:2022-08-31

Inversion test of rotating blade surface pressure
Institution:1.Aviation Technology Key Laboratory of Aeroacoustic and Virbration, Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China, Aviation Industry Corporation of China,Limited,Xi’an 710065,China2.School of Energy and Power Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China
Abstract:In order to verify the inversion calculation method of the surface pressure of the rotating blade, an inversion test platform for the surface pressure of the rotating blade was built, and the inversion test for the surface pressure of a set of two-blade propellers was carried out. The far-field noise of the propeller was measured by a microphone array, and the static pressure on the blade surface was measured by a Kulite pressure sensor and an offline collector, and then compared with the calculated results. The results showed that under the working conditions studied, the calculated results were in good agreement with the experimental results, and the trend was basically the same; the error between the experimental results and the calculated results of two measuring points was within 1%, and the accuracy was very high; the contrast difference between the points was large, which was mainly caused by the installation process error of the pressure sensor. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《航空动力学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《航空动力学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号