首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

大展弦比机翼总体刚度的气动弹性优化设计
引用本文:刘东岳,万志强,杨超,唐长红.大展弦比机翼总体刚度的气动弹性优化设计[J].航空学报,2011,32(6):1025-1031.
作者姓名:刘东岳  万志强  杨超  唐长红
作者单位:北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院,北京,100191
基金项目:高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金
摘    要:针对大展弦比机翼总体刚度设计问题,提出了梁架模型气动弹性优化和三维优化模型折算两种设计方法,并以大展弦比机翼为例对两种方法的合理性进行了验证.前者基于机翼梁架式模型,利用气动弹性优化方法对其主梁刚度进行设计,其特点是建模简单、计算效率较高,可以在设计信息较少的概念和初步设计阶段使用,但由于约束条件考虑较少,设计结果相对...

关 键 词:气动弹性  机翼  刚度设计  优化设计  工程方法
收稿时间:2010-09-29;

Aeroelastic Optimization Design of Global Stiffness for High Aspect Ratio Wing
LIU Dongyue,WAN Zhiqiang,YANG Chao,TANG Changhong.Aeroelastic Optimization Design of Global Stiffness for High Aspect Ratio Wing[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2011,32(6):1025-1031.
Authors:LIU Dongyue  WAN Zhiqiang  YANG Chao  TANG Changhong
Institution:School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China
Abstract:Two methods to design the global stiffness of a high aspect ratio wing are introduced, i.e., the beam-frame model aeroelastic optimization method, and the three-dimensional optimization model conversion method. Taking a high aspect ratio wing as an example, rationality of the two methods is proved. Based on the beam-frame model, the global stiffness of the model main beam is designed by the first method using aeroelastic optimization. Because of its modeling simplicity and calculating efficiency, this method can be applied to the concept and primary design stage, though the precision is not high enough on account of its insufficient consideration of constraints. Based on the three-dimensional model, the global stiffness of the wing is designed by the second method using aeroelastic optimization and engineering beam conversion. The design stiffness by this method is closer to the actual critical case which takes into consideration the strength constraints, aeroelastic constraints, and process constraints. This method can be used in the primary design stage when some structure data is obtained; however, it has lower efficiency due to its high requirement of structure data and structure modeling. Through calculating and comparing the results, the consistency and engineering practicability of the stiffness distribution by the two methods are verified. Compared with the conventional estimation method, the two aeroelastic optimization methods are more reasonable.
Keywords:aeroelastic  wings  stiffness design  optimization design  engineering method
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《航空学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《航空学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号