首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Selected configuration tradeoffs of contour optical instruments
Institution:1. The Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA;2. Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Space Sciences Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;3. Astronomy Department, The University Of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA;1. Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, United Kingdom;2. Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever R&D, Colworth Science Park, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, United Kingdom
Abstract:The Comet Nucleus Tour (CONTOUR) is a low-cost NASA Discovery mission designed to conduct three close flybys of comet nuclei. Selected configuration tradeoffs conducted to balance science requirements with low mission cost are reviewed. The tradeoffs discussed focus on the optical instruments and related spacecraft considerations. Two instruments are under development. The CONTOUR Forward Imager (CFI) is designed to perform optical navigation, moderate resolution nucleus/jet imaging, and imaging of faint molecular emission bands in the coma. The CONTOUR Remote Imager and Spectrometer (CRISP) is designed to obtain high-resolution multispectral images of the nucleus, conduct spectral mapping of the nucleus surface, and provide a backup optical navigation capability.Tradeoffs discussed are: (1) the impact on the optical instruments of not using reaction wheels on the spacecraft, (2) the improved performance and simplification gained by implementing a dedicated star tracker instead of including this function in CFI, (3) the improved flexibility and robustness of switching to a low frame rate tracker for CRISP, (4) the improved performance and simplification of replacing a visible imaging spectrometer by enhanced multispectral imaging in CRISP, and (5) the impact on spacecraft resources of these and other tradeoffs.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号