首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

CME引起的地磁暴穿越时间
引用本文:孟琛,吕建永,王明,顾春利,季海生.CME引起的地磁暴穿越时间[J].空间科学学报,2019,39(3):303-309.
作者姓名:孟琛  吕建永  王明  顾春利  季海生
作者单位:南京信息工程大学空间天气研究所 南京210044;北京应用气象研究所 北京100029;中国科学院紫金山天文台 南京210008
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(U1631107,41574158,41604141)和江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20160952)共同资助
摘    要:日冕物质抛射(CME)从发生至引起地磁暴最大值的时间间隔称为穿越时间.本文选取1997-2015年89个CME-Dst事件,分析CME速度、能量、耀斑类型等对穿越时间的影响;采用非线性拟合以及支持向量机(SVM)非线性回归技术,建立基于1997-2009年62个CME-Dst事件的CF模型和SVM模型,并利用其余27个CME-Dst事件对模型预报效果分别进行检验.结果表明,CF模型和SVM模型的预报准确率均达到85.2%,其中CF模型的平均绝对值误差为13.77 h,而SVM模型为13.88 h.与ECA模型结果(准确率为77.8%,平均绝对值误差为14.55 h)进行对比发现,CF模型和SVM模型的准确率更高而误差更小.CF模型和SVM模型能够提前1~5天较好地预报地磁暴爆发时间.

关 键 词:日冕物质抛射  地磁暴  穿越时间  曲线拟合  支持向量机
收稿时间:2018-02-27

Transport Time for the Geomagnetic Storm Caused by CME
MENG Chen,LU Jianyong,WANG Ming,GU Chunli,JI Haisheng.Transport Time for the Geomagnetic Storm Caused by CME[J].Chinese Journal of Space Science,2019,39(3):303-309.
Authors:MENG Chen  LU Jianyong  WANG Ming  GU Chunli  JI Haisheng
Institution:1. Institute of Space Weather, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044;2. Beijing Institute of Applied Meteorology, Beijing 100029;3. Purple Mountain Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008
Abstract:The transport time is defined as the interval time between the occurrence of CME and the maximum value of the geomagnetic storm. In view of the 89 CME-Dst events collected from 1997 to 2015, the impact of CME speed, energy, and flare type on the transport time is analyzed. Using the non-linear fitting and the nonlinear regression of the Support Vector Machine (SVM), the Curve Fitting (CF) model and the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model for the CME transport time are built. In these models, 62 CME-Dst events during 1997-2006 are used as model input, and the remaining 27 CME-Dst events are used to test the model prediction. The results show that the prediction accuracies both of CF model and SVM model reach at about 85.2%, and the average absolute error of CF model is 13.77h while the SVM model is 13.88h. Comparing with the ECA model (its prediction accuracy is 77.8%, and the average absolute error is 14.55h), the accuracy of these two models is higher and the error is smaller than that of the ECA model. Therefore, CF model and SVM model can predict accurately the geomagnetic storm explosion with 1~5 days in advance. 
Keywords:CME  Geomagnetic storm  Transport time  Curve fitting  Support vector machine
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《空间科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《空间科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号