“嫦娥一号”卫星的调相轨道设计

中国第一颗月球探测卫星"嫦娥一号"的飞行轨道的设计中采用了调相轨道,在"长征三号甲"运载火箭提供的超地球同步转移轨道与地月转移轨道之间增加了一段由周期为24h和48h轨道构成的环绕地球飞行的调相轨道。为了将几条不同的轨道精确地拼接起来,必须考虑地球引力场对轨道的摄动影响。克服这个难点的做法是基于经典的轨道摄动理论,先将整段调相轨道设计为考虑地球引力场J2项影响的平轨道,在与运载的发射轨道拼接时,先将运载的包括短周期摄动的瞬时轨道转换为平轨道,在与地月转移轨道拼接时将调相轨道转换成拼接点的瞬时轨道。由于采用了平轨道的处理方法使得轨道控制策略的表述十分简明并易于操作。     

空间交会调相综合变轨优化

基于近圆轨道偏差线性方程研究了摄动交会调相综合变轨问题,建立了综合变轨两层非线性优化模型:上层问题以变轨点纬度幅角为优化变量,下层问题以脉冲向量为优化变量.为了快速获得上层问题全局优化性较好的摄动解,采用了并行模拟退火算法与序列二次规划算法相结合的混合策略;下层问题使用基于可行域最速下降的线性迭代方法求解.采用一个两天近地轨道调相问题测试了本文的综合变轨求解策略,并将综合变轨与特殊点变轨、综合变轨混合优化与遗传算法优化进行了比较.结果表明,建立的两层优化模型是有效的,本文的求解策略有着良好的全局收敛性和较高的收敛效率,综合变轨相对于特殊点变轨可以显著地节省燃料.     

空间交会调相特殊点变轨求解算法

空间交会调相是交会轨道控制的关键问题,本文给出了摄动条件下交会调相特殊点变轨求解算法.算法由粗求解器和细求解器组成:粗求解器中仅迭代部分设计变量,其余设计变量由Gauss型摄动运动方程解析计算;细求解器以粗求解器计算结果为初值,迭代所有设计变量获得较精确满足终端条件的解.算法简单可靠,适用于工程实际,算法的有效性得到了STK高精度轨道预报模块的验证.     

嫦娥五号月球轨道交会对接远程导引轨道设计与飞行实践

结合月球轨道交会对接任务的特殊性和中国探月工程的实际工程约束,介绍了嫦娥五号任务月球轨道交会对接远程导引轨道设计,包括轨道器调相和上升器远程导引两方面内容,重点介绍了月球轨道交会对接远程导引多脉冲调相轨道方案的选择、标称轨道优化设计、轨控策略和误差分析结果以及实际飞行轨道控制的情况。飞行实践数据分析表明：嫦娥五号任务月球轨道交会对接远程导引轨道设计是正确合理的,实际飞行的速度增量满足推进剂预算的要求,全飞行过程测控条件良好,交班点控制精度完全满足转自主控制的要求,有力保障了交会对接和样品转移的顺利完成。     

Phasing with near rectilinear Halo orbits: Design and comparison

In the next future, space agencies are planning to return to the Moon. The objective is to assemble an orbiting space station, called Gateway, on a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit around the Moon as a base for future Moon and deep space missions. Within this framework, multiple side missions will be planned to sustain the Gateway (Artemis mission). The proposed work is thought in framework of the preliminary design of future cargo missions, in particular on the design of an efficient phasing trajectory, under the Circular Restricted Three body problem hypotheses, to bring a cargo vehicle from the end of the Earth-Moon transfer to the beginning of the proximity operations such as rendezvous and docking with the space station. The work aims covering the lack of literature in phasing trajectories with the NRHO by proposing three different strategies to connect the Earth-Moon transfer trajectory with the proximity operations. The three strategies are classified based on the choice of the parking orbits or the choice of the manifolds. Two strategies use butterfly and Halo orbits to park the vehicle before transferring to the target orbit. The third strategy, instead, uses manifolds to allow a direct phasing. In the paper, the three innovative strategies are designed and compare in a specific scenario.