高职生授课方式和考试模式改革略论

对于高职生的教学改革要从授课方式和考试方式两方面进行.在授课方式上,教师要将具体的实际知识.化繁为简,并借助计算机软件进行教学.在考试方式上提出了两种模式,一种是学生事先知道要考内容的随机抽取试题模式;另一种是试题由学生自出模式.有利于减轻学生学习压力和厌学情绪.     

改善高等数学教学效果的主要途径

在高等数学教学中,学生学习主动性不强、兴趣不浓的问题比较普遍。为解决这些问题,阐述了从建立良好师生关系、调整教学方式方法、应用多媒体教学和融入教学建模思想等方面激发学生的学习兴趣。     

高职《机械制图》实践教学的探讨

根据高职教育对《机械制图》课程实践教学的实际需求，加强和改善实践教学的内容、方法，探讨新时期高职《机械制图》实践教学新模式，为国家培养应用型高素质的技术人才很有必要。     

任务型《实用英语》课堂教学实验报告

通过传统型与任务型两个教学班的不同的授课方法，测试结果显示：两班学生在英语学习方面的努力程度相似，但实验后的两次水平测试结果表明实验班学生(任务型)优于控制班(传统型)的学生。     

利用多媒体技术拓展体育教学空间

体育教育的改革和发展必须融入现代社会与科学技术的发展大潮，以计算机为主体的多媒体教学使传统的体育教学方法发生了巨大变革，体育教育应转变思想，更新观念，探索教育新模式、新方法以适应时代发展的需要。为此，在体育教学中对如何运用多媒体技术改进体育教学方法、指导教学效果等方面进行了探索。     

Space law education in China: Status quo,shortcomings and possible ways out

Space law education has an essential role in the space capacity building of a country because of its importance for human resources development in space law. Comparisons between Canada and China, the European Union and China and the United States of America (USA) and China in space law degree education, course, teaching methodology, institute and practice and communication platform are provided in an attempt to review some issues which exist within the Chinese space law educational system and to seek a better choice for China’s space law education reform. Chinese space law education has achieved noticeable progress over the past two decades. However, it is still limited in comparison to its counterparts in Europe and Northern America. The range of the space law degree education programmes and space-law-related courses is comparatively limited. A gap remains between space law education and practice in China. Chinese space law classes are still dominated by the teacher-centred teaching methodology, although several universities have some new teaching practices. The establishment of seven space law-related research institutes plays an increasingly important role in Chinese space law education, space law and policy research and legal advisory services for the Chinese government and non-governmental sectors. However, these institutes still have a long way to go in comparison with their counterparts in Europe and Northern America. While China has established domestic research platforms for space law communication through international cooperation, it does not provide space law practice platforms for space law education. While international space law does not provide a direct legal foundation for space law education in China, Chinese educational laws can lay a profound legal foundation for Chinese space law education. To promote its national expertise and capacity in space law, based on the three-pillar model and the experiences of its counterparts in North America and Europe, China should adopt a systematic and sustainable regime for its space law education.