A review of uncertainty in flight vehicle structural damage monitoring,diagnosis and control: Challenges and opportunities

This paper presents a comprehensive review of uncertainties involved in flight vehicle structural damage monitoring, diagnosis, prognosis and control. Uncertainties can cause infeasibilities, false diagnosis and very imprecise prognosis if not correctly taken into account. The purpose of this paper is to review existing methods that have been developed to address the problem of uncertainty in the area of damage sensing, diagnosis, prognosis and control in flight vehicles. The mathematical and statistical methods in analyzing uncertainty are first presented and compared. Then, the different sources and perspectives of uncertainties in the damage assessment process are presented and classified. Following this, diagnosis and prognosis methods are reviewed. Final review section covers the control of damaged structure under uncertainty. In each section and in the concluding remarks section the research challenges in the field of flight vehicle structural damage sensing, diagnosis and prognosis methods as well as control under uncertainty are identified and promising new ideas are discussed.     

A permanently-acting NEA damage mitigation technique via the Yarkovsky effect

In the later stages of a combined mission of exploration and damage mitigation of a hazardous Near Earth Asteroid (NEA), sufficiently detailed tracking, orbit prediction, mass distribution, and physical properties data have been accumulated. It may be desirable to implement a “slow push” damage mitigation technique that is capable of altering the NEA orbit continuously and permanently. This possibility was suggested in a companion paper that outlined an archetypal exploration/mitigation mission to the NEA 99942 Apophis, which is achieved using a novel albedo change approach. The details and apparatus used in the albedo modification technique are described in the paper. We describe the design details and the constraints on particle size (to prevent electrostatic levitation and escape) and on the dispensing speed (to achieve the desired coverage zone and prevent particles from orbiting or escaping).