用场向电流的观测结果研究高纬电离层电场

本文从Triad卫星观测到的场向电流日变化的统计结果出发, 利用场向电流日变化的付里叶级数展开和简单模式法分别求出电导率均匀时和极光带电导率增强时高纬电离层电位的分析解.结果表明, 电场集中在极光区是由2区场向电流引起的.在本文所用的场向电流分布形式下, 加上Pederson电导率的升高。极光区Hall电导率的增大反而有助于电场向中纬穿透.|AL|≥100γ时, 场向电流分布对对流圈位置西向旋转起一定作用, 但极光带Hall电导率的变化是造成大角度旋转的主要原因.Perdson电导率的增大, 对旋转角无影响.结果还表明, 在不考虑电导率日夜不均匀时, 由于场向电流复杂的日变化, 也可出现对流圈的晨昏不对称性.以上的电场分布形态, 与观测的电场形态基本相符。      

用极区双雷达研究高纬电离层电场——对观测结果的物理讨论

本文以极区双雷达STARE系统观测到的高纬E区电场(65°—70°范围内)之形态为基础,用简单模式法对其中部分有趣现象进行了讨论。静日(1≤K_p≤3)形态与Vasyliunas模式符合较好。其晨一昏不对称性可部分地由电导率日一夜不均匀性解释,同时也说明在磁层中亦应有晨-昏不对称因素。本文还提出了两个简单模式,以讨论扰日对流圈的西向旋转。其一讨论了场向电流一、二区的相对强度产生之效果;其二考虑了Hall和Pederson电导率之比的作用,并对此两模式进行了比较。为了进一步搞清这个问题,需对磁层过程有更多的了解,也需要对电场和场向电流进行同时性的观测。      

非径向地磁力线对计算电离层电场及三维电流系的部分影响

本文对Kamide等人的由地面磁变化计算电离层电场、电流及场向电流的方法做了改进。给出了计入非径向地磁力线对电离层电导率影响下的电位φ的二阶偏微分方程。通过实例计算考查了由地面磁资料计算电离层电场、电流及场向电流中地磁力线非径向性的部分效应。结果表明,即使在高纬极光区,这部分效应也是重要的、不能忽视的;此外,计入这一效应使得计算量明显减少。      

用STARE-TRIAD联合观测对磁层-电离层不完全耦合的实例研究

本文用STARE-TRIAD联合观测的一个实例研究磁层-电离层不完全耦合现象.实例中观测的电场、场向电流和推出的Pederson电导率在Harang不连续区的分布与用Kan-Lee磁层-电离层不完全耦合理论的预测值符合得很好.这支持了该理论所说的在电等位U-位形低纬侧有S-位形存在以及与之相应的电离层电导率的第二增强区和电场凹陷区等现象.STARE的其他观测事实说明这些现象具有一定的普遍意义.      

场向电流随亚暴位相的变化

利用ISEE1和2卫星测量的磁场数据,计算了电离层中的场向电流。依据每个场向电流事件所伴随的亚暴位相,分别计算了一区和二区场向电流强度、密度及电流片厚度在亚暴成长相、膨胀相和恢复相的平均值及中间值。其结果,从成长相到膨胀相,一区和二区场向电流的强度和密度增加,从膨胀相到恢复相,其值减小。平均说来,一区的电流强度约是二区的1.4倍。电流片厚度的变化在上述期间内与电流强度及密度的变化趋势相反。      

磁扰日向阳面对流电场转向区位置的晨昏不对称性(STARE、TRIAD、AE-C观测综合分析)

本文通过STARE观测的晨不连续性及其与TRIAD观测的场向电流分界区、AE-C卫星观测的电场转向区位置的比较,提出了在高扰日向阳面对流电场转向区位置存在着晨不对称性——晨半面所处纬度低于昏半面.该现象间接说明向阳面磁层边界层也存在某种不对称性.并在观测基础上对可造成该不对称性的物理因子进行了探讨,认为行星际磁场螺线结构对重连区位置的影响及其产生的激波结构的晨昏不对称性很可能与本文中讨论的现象有一定联系.      

行星际磁场B_y分量对磁尾场向电流的控制作用

利用Cluster卫星的磁场探测数据及ACE卫星的行星际磁场(IMF)探测数据,研究了IMF B_y分量(IMF|B_y|10nT)对磁尾等离子体片边界层(PSBL)区场向电流发生率和密度的影响.研究显示:与IMF B_y分量为负时进行比较,IMF B_y分量为正时场向电流的发生率更高,约55.6%;当IMF|B_y|4nT时场向电流发生率占总发生率的77.4%;场向电流发生率随IMF|B_y|的增大而增大,且具有很好的线性相关关系,当IMF B_y分量为正时,相关性更好;场向电流密度也随IMF|B_y|的增大而增大,同样具有很好的线性相关关系,当IMF B_y分量为正时,相关性更好.以上结果表明,IMF B_y分量对磁尾场向电流的产生和变化具有很强的控制作用,并且昏向IMF变化与场向电流变化的关系更加密切.     

电离层等效电流体系对行星际激波的响应研究

行星际激波是导致地球磁层-电离层系统发生扰动的重要原因之一,其可以通过对磁层-电离层系统电流体系的改变来影响地磁变化.本文采用全球三维磁流体力学数值模拟方法,分析了行星际激波作用下电离层等效电流体系的即时响应.模拟结果表明,在激波作用下伴随着异常场向电流对的产生,电离层在午前午后出现一对反向的等效电流涡.这对涡旋一边向极侧和夜侧运动,一边经历强度增强和减弱直至消失的过程.激波过后等效电流体系图像逐渐演化为激波下游行星际条件控制的典型图像.这个响应过程与行星际激波强度有关,激波强度越强,则反向的等效电流涡旋强度越大,寿命也就越短.      

基于Cluster观测的磁尾场向电流在南北半球投影位置的分布

利用Cluster四颗卫星的磁场探测数据计算磁尾场向电流并投影到极区电离层,研究其投影位置在南北半球的分布规律,统计过程中去除了强磁暴（磁暴主相Dst<–100 nT）期间的场向电流事件。结果显示:磁尾场向电流事件在极区投影位置的纬度分布具有明显的南北半球不对称性,北半球为单峰结构,南半球为双峰结构。在北半球投影到较低纬度（<64°）的场向电流事件数目明显多于南半球,并且所能达到的最低纬度更低;在南半球投影到较高纬度（>74°）的场向电流事件数目明显多于北半球,并且所能达到的最高纬度更高。地磁平静条件下（|AL|<100 nT）,磁尾场向电流密度随磁地方时（MLT）呈递增趋势,这一结果与低高度卫星在极区对I区场向电流的探测结果符合很好。研究结果表明,磁尾场向电流投影位置的纬度分布呈现出明显的南北不对称性,这与南北半球磁尾场向电流的空间分布以及磁层中磁场结构具有密切关系。      

环电流区能量离子分布特性研究

为了考察环电流区离子的分布情况,采用环电流粒子理论模式,对环电流中10-100 keV的离子进行了模拟研究.这个模式能够根据近地注入区外边界处离子的分布函数得出磁暴主相期间环电流中的主要成分H+,O+,He+3种离子的通量分布.计算结果分析表明,在其他条件相同的情况下,不同种类离子的通量分布的形态结构十分相似.电场强度对环电流离子通量的空间分布具有决定性的作用;晨昏电场强度越强,离子的通量越高;晨昏电场越强,环电流离子的内边界越接近地球.10keV的离子在电场相当弱的时候还是存在着连续的通量分布,但他们的形态和结构随着电场的变化有明显的变化.电场很弱时,离子分布主要集中于内外两个环带,离子通量在晨侧的更多一些,离子通量的最大值基本上是在比较靠近地球的环带上;随着电场的增强,离子分布的内外两个环带逐步合并,离子的分布逐渐靠近地球,通量分布的最大值也移动到了昏侧.环电流离子投掷角分布具有各向异性,投掷角在90°左右的时候,离子通量能达到最大值.      

Controlling factors of Region 2 field-aligned current and its relationship to the ring current: Model results

One essential component of magnetosphere and ionosphere coupling is the closure of the ring current through Region 2 field-aligned current (FAC). Using the Comprehensive Ring Current Model (CRCM), which includes magnetosphere and ionosphere coupling by solving the kinetic equation of ring current particles and the closure of the electric currents between the two regions, we have investigated the effects of high latitude potential, ionospheric conductivity, plasma sheet density and different magnetic field models on the development of Region 2 field-aligned currents, and the relationship between R2 FACs and the ring current. It is shown that an increase in high latitude potential, ionospheric conductivity or plasma sheet density generally results in an increase in Region 2 FACs’ intensity, but R2 FACs display different local time and latitudinal distributions for changes in each parameter due to the different mechanisms involved. Our simulation results show that the magnetic field configuration of the inner magnetosphere is also an important factor in the development of Region 2 field-aligned current. More numerical experiments and observational results are needed in further our understanding of the complex relationship of the two current systems.     

The importance of conductivity gradients in ground-based field-aligned current studies

Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling is achieved primarily through magnetic field-aligned currents. Such currents are difficult to measure directly and are usually inferred from satellite magnetometer recordings or from ground-based measurements of the divergence of ionospheric electric fields. The latter technique requires a knowledge of the ionospheric conductance distribution. Although it is possible to obtain the ionospheric electric field distribution over large spatial areas with good temporal resolution from coherent backscatter radars, these instruments cannot measure conductivity. Since the equation for computing field-aligned currents explicitly requires the gradient in conductance to be known, the use of statistically averaged models is excluded for case studies. If a dense enough array of magnetometers is available, these data may be used in combination with radar data to produce a measured conductance distribution within the overlapping fields of view. This has been done for data obtained in northern Scandinavia. Comparing field-aligned currents, computed with and without knowing the ionospheric conductance distribution, shows that gradients in conductance can not be ignored, even for quiet geomagnetic conditions.     

Statistical average estimates of high latitude field-aligned currents from the STARE and SABRE coherent VHF radar systems

Two bistatic VHF radar systems, STARE and SABRE, have been employed to estimate ionospheric electric fields in the geomagnetic latitude range 61.1 – 69.3° (geographic latitude range 63.8 – 72.6°) over northern Scandinavia. 173 days of good backscatter from all four radars have been analysed during the period 1982 to 1986, from which the average ionospheric divergence electric field versus latitude and time is calculated. The average magnetic field-aligned currents are computed using an AE-dependent empirical model of the ionospheric conductance. Statistical Birkeland current estimates are presented for high and low values of the Kp and AE indices as well as positive and negative orientations of the IMF B_z component. The results compare very favourably to other ground-based and satellite measurements.     

On the effect of near-equatorial thunderstorms on the global distribution of ionospheric potential

We develop our earlier attempts to perform an indirect quantitative examination of the hypothesis that electric currents flowing up from thunderstorms to the ionosphere (also known as Wilson currents) charge the ionosphere to a large positive potential with respect to the Earth. First, we take the electrostatic potential arising from the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s magnetosphere derived from an experimental data-based model of the high-latitude field-aligned currents. We then obtain the global distribution of ionospheric potential, utilizing a thin shell model, based on integration along field lines of the current continuity equation with a realistic model of ionospheric conductivity. Next, we include additional upward currents to simulate the effect of the three main thunderstorm regions over equatorial Asia/Oceania, Africa and the Americas. We compare the local time variation of the eastward electric field in the ionosphere produced by these three equatorial sources separately, and seek to understand the substantial differences between them. Finally, we examine the variation with local time of the eastward electric field in the ionosphere at low latitudes.     

A model for the propagation of the westward traveling surge

A unified model is developed for the propagation of the Westward Traveling Surge (WTS) which can explain the diversity in the observed surge characteristics. The direction of the surge motion depends on the presence of polarization charges on the poleward boundary. This is related to the efficiency with which the poleward ionospheric currents are closed off into the magnetosphere by the field-aligned currents. Inclusion of the electron-ion recombination rate modifies the surge propagation velocity and leads to explicit expressions for the conductivity profile. Sufficient precipitation current is required to overcome electron-ion recombination in order for the surge to expand. When the precipitating current is less than this threshold the WTS retreats. Therefore, the model describes the ionospheric response to both the expansion and recovery phases of the magnetic substorm.     

The solar wind control of the equatorial ionosphere dynamics during geomagnetic storms

The interplanetary magnetic field, geomagnetic variations, virtual ionosphere height h′F, and the critical frequency foF2 data during the geomagnetic storms are studied to demonstrate relationships between these phenomena. We study 5-min ionospheric variations using the first Western Pacific Ionosphere Campaign (1998–1999) observations, 5-min interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and 5-min auroral electrojets data during a moderate geomagnetic storm. These data allowed us to demonstrate that the auroral and the equatorial ionospheric phenomena are developed practically simultaneously. Hourly average of the ionospheric foF2 and h′F variations at near equatorial stations during a similar storm show the same behavior. We suppose this is due to interaction between electric fields of the auroral and the equatorial ionosphere during geomagnetic storms. It is shown that the low-latitude ionosphere dynamics during these moderate storms was defined by the southward direction of the B_z-component of the interplanetary magnetic field. A southward IMF produces the Region I and Region II field-aligned currents (FAC) and polar electrojet current systems. We assume that the short-term ionospheric variations during geomagnetic storms can be explained mainly by the electric field of the FAC. The electric fields of the field-aligned currents can penetrate throughout the mid-latitude ionosphere to the equator and may serve as a coupling agent between the auroral and the equatorial ionosphere.