小波变换在空间扩展目标精密跟踪中的应用

本文介绍了小波变换的特点及其在图象边缘提取中的意义，讨论了边缘提取中最有效的小波函数及方法，介绍了以飞机图象为目标在不同图象模糊程度及背景噪音情况下用小波变换进行目标形心坐标提取的计算机模拟情况，展示了小波变换在扩展目标跟踪技术中应用的前景。     

基于角速度估计自适应的IMM目标跟踪算法

为了解决目标强机动时目标跟踪算法模型集不匹配的问题,提出了一种基于角速度估计的自适应交互式多模型算法。通过对角速度的估计,在目标的不同运动模式下选取最优模型集,角速度估计精度高时,通过角速度估计值构造模型集,减小模型间竞争;角速度估计精度低时,采用标准IMM算法的模型集,提高模型集的覆盖范围,从而提高跟踪精度。仿真结果表明该方法能够明显提升目标跟踪性能,对强机动目标的跟踪效果尤其显著。     

单天基平台测向的空间非合作目标跟踪

针对仅含角度测量信息的单个天基平台可观测性较弱的问题,提出了一种含脉冲机动检测的空间非合作目标跟踪算法,并设计了非合作目标实时跟踪数据处理流程.该算法利用抗差估计技术和UKF（Unscented Kalman Filter,无迹卡尔曼滤波）算法构造目标跟踪滤波器,并综合残差多项式拟合和新息分布特征等方法实现目标机动检测,在天基平台观测信息类型有限和观测几何较差的情况下,可以同时排除孤立野值和成片测量野值的影响,实现非合作机动目标的连续稳定跟踪.数值实验验证了算法的可行性和有效性,也表明了跟踪精度和可靠性与测量精度密切相关.     

利用雷达数据事后确定机动式再入目标的弹道

本文研究出一种利用雷达跟踪数据事后分析确定机动式再入目标的气动参数的技术。本技术使用了加权最小二乘序贯估计器,该估计器在各批处理数据中依次步进移动。观测值为来自分布在落点附近精密跟踪雷达的角度和距离数据。用六维估计器(三维位置和三维速度)来估计再入目标自由飞行段的状态。本文还导出了两种再入估计器:第一个是七维估计器,包括六维自由飞行参数加上一个弹道系数,用来估计弹道再入段的状态,第二个是九维机动再入目标估计器,一旦有机动发生就用这种估计器。研究出一种基于测量残差监视的算法,可以自适应地从六态估计器转换成七态估计器,再到九态估计器。进行了一系列数值仿真,检验了这种技术及其编程。利用蒙特卡罗仿真验证了估计器的协方差矩阵的精度。     

基于IMMKF算法的ADS-B监视应用目标跟踪

目标跟踪是机载广播式自动相关监视（ADS-B）应用的基础功能,对提升航空器周边的弱机动民航飞机目标跟踪性能具有重要意义。提出一种基于交互式多模型卡尔曼滤波（IMMKF）算法的ADS-B 监视应用目标跟踪方法。首先,针对弱机动背景下的民航飞机的飞行特点,建立包含匀速模型和标准协同转弯模型的运动模型集,并对模型进行线性化近似;然后,将模型预测和ADS-B 状态矢量量测数据作为IMMKF 算法中多个并行卡尔曼滤波器的输入,进行并行滤波;最后,计算得到目标状态矢量的估计和模型近似概率,并作为下一次迭代的输入。结果表明：相比于基于匀速模型的卡尔曼滤波目标跟踪方法,IMMKF 方法的位置跟踪误差降低了59%,速度跟踪误差降低了77%,显著提升了状态估计性能,具备较高的跟踪精度、稳健性与计算效率,在ADS-B 监视应用中具有实际应用价值与借鉴意义。     

一种混合的扩展目标跟踪方法

与传统的目标跟踪不同,扩展目标跟踪（EOT）不忽略目标的轮廓特征,同时对目标的质心运动学状态和轮廓特征进行估计。基于随机矩阵的扩展目标跟踪方法用随机正定矩阵来描述目标的轮廓特征,并且建立了适合扩展目标跟踪的量测模型。为了改善目标机动时的跟踪性能,根据椭圆（体）与正定矩阵的关系,提出基于椭圆（体）拟合的扩展目标跟踪方法。进一步地,为了综合上述两类方法的优点,提出一种混合的扩展目标跟踪方法,能够根据目标机动与否在两类方法中进行选择。仿真结果表明,该混合方法的轮廓特征估计误差低于前述两类方法,质心运动学状态的估计性能也更好。     

机载雷达目标跟踪与航迹信息提取

针对机动目标跟踪中航迹信息提取精度不高的问题,提出一种ECEF坐标系下基于交互多模型的多机协同跟踪算法。首先,各载机以ECEF坐标系为融合中心对目标量测进行无偏转换处理,以有效减小量测转换误差对目标跟踪的影响;然后,利用交互多模型的方法对目标进行融合跟踪,以进一步提高目标机动时的跟踪精度;最后,通过二次滤波的方法,来有效实现目标航迹信息的精确提取。仿真结果表明,该算法可较好地提高目标机动时的跟踪精度和航迹信息提取精度。     

改进的MMPHD机动目标跟踪方法

基于序列蒙特卡罗方法的经典多模概率假设密度滤波方法及其各种衍生方法,在预测过程中依据多个并行的状态转移模型,通过将大量粒子散布到下一时刻目标所有可能出现的状态空间实现目标状态的捕获,造成计算量大、目标跟踪精度差。为此,提出一种改进的多模粒子概率假设密度机动目标跟踪方法。该方法利用最新量测信息估计目标运动模型概率及模型参数,并将估计得到的目标模型应用到粒子概率假设密度滤波方法的预测过程中生成预测粒子,从而将大部分粒子聚合在目标最可能出现的状态空间邻域中,实现粒子的有效利用。数值仿真表明,所提方法不仅显著地减少了目标丢失个数,而且提高了目标跟踪精度。     

利用一维像序列时域差分估计目标进动频率

针对弹道目标识别中目标运动特征参数估计问题,提出一种一维距离像（HRRP）序列时域差分目标进动频率估计方法,该方法首先对一维距离像进行归一化处理,利用峰值法对齐相邻一维距离像,然后计算相邻一维距离像之间的差分值,获得相邻一维距离像差分值序列,最后采用快速傅里叶变换（FFT）从该差分值序列中估计目标进动频率。该方法具有以下优点：利用相邻一维距离像差分值序列能够增强目标进动频率成份,降低其他频率成份,更有利于进动频率的估计;只需要对齐相邻2个一维距离像,而避免了对齐一维距离像序列所带来的问题。利用由FEKO软件计算的进动目标宽带一维距离像仿真数据进行了实验,结果表明所提方法比常规的加权累积法更有效,估计精度更高。     

利用跟踪-微分器构造机动目标估计模型

在分析目标运动特点的基础上,提出了一种新的基于跟踪-微分器的机动目标估计模型。该估计模型与卡尔曼滤波算法相结合,能够在动态过程完全未知的情况下估计出目标运动参数,且估计模型简单,物理意义明确,能够适应于目标的各种机动行为模式。仿真结果表明,具有跟踪-微分器结构的估计模型不但具有很强的适应性,而且能够获得满意的估计精度。     

Tracking of crossing targets with imaging sensors

The authors present an algorithm for the tracking of crossing targets using the centroid measurement and the centroid offset measurement of the distributed image formed by the targets. The measurements are obtained by a forward-looking infrared (FLIR) imaging sensor. The joint probabilistic data association merged-measurement coupled filter (JPDAMCF) is used for state estimation which performs filtering in a coupled manner for the targets with common measurements. Two filters are examined: one assuming the displacement noise white and the other one modeling it correctly as autocorrelated. The latter is shown to yield substantially better performance. The proposed algorithm demonstrates the usefulness of the JPDAMCF for tracking crossing targets in combination with the models for the centroid and offset measurements. Even though the centroid offset measurement requires more computations and a more complex model for estimation, it yields significantly better results if the filter accounts for its colored measurement noise     

Use of measurements from an imaging sensor for precision targettracking

The extraction of measurements for precision tracking of the centroid of a target from a forward-looking infrared imaging sensor is presented. The size of the image of the target is assumed to be small, i.e. around 10 pixels. The statistical characterization of the centroid of the target is obtained. Similarly, the statistical properties of the image correlation of two frames, which measures the target offset, are derived. Explicit expressions that map the video noise statistics into measurement noise statistics are obtained. The offset measurement noise is shown to be autocorrelated. State variable models for tracking the target centroid with these measurements are then presented. Simulation results and quantitative conclusions about achievable subpixel tracking accuracy are given. It is shown that the filter that models the autocorrelated measurement noise provides the best performance     

Tracking a ballistic target: comparison of several nonlinear filters

This paper studies the problem of tracking a ballistic object in the reentry phase by processing radar measurements. A suitable (highly nonlinear) model of target motion is developed and the theoretical Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) of estimation error are derived. The estimation performance (error mean and standard deviation; consistency test) of the following nonlinear filters is compared: the extended Kalman filter (EKF), the. statistical linearization, the particle filtering, and the unscented Kalman filter (UKF). The simulation results favor the EKF; it combines the statistical efficiency with a modest computational load. This conclusion is valid when the target ballistic coefficient is a priori known.     

Streamlining measurement iteration for EKF target tracking

The estimation problem is defined, and a review of how the linear estimation approach of Kalman filtering is extrapolated to form an extended Kalman filter (EKF), applicable for state estimation in nonlinear systems is presented. A mechanization of an EKF variation known as an iterated EKF, offering improved tracking performance, is treated. A streamlined version of an iterated EKF that has a lesser computational burden (fewer operations per cycle or time step) than prior formulations is offered. A nonlinear filtering application example, to be used as a testbed for this new approach, is described, and the detailed modeling considerations as needed for exoatmospheric random-variable radar target tracking are discussed. The performance of the streamlined mechanization is illustrated in this radar target tracking example, and comparisons are made with the performance of an EKF without measurement iteration     

基于序列图像的航天器自主导航降维滤波方法

非合作目标的运动感知与状态估计,是太空领域技术发展的重要组成部分。非合作目标相对状态的精确估计是相对导航的难点问题。传统的非合作目标扩展卡尔曼滤波算法需要结合非合作目标的质心位置,增加了状态变量的维数,提高了系统不确定性,从而会影响状态扩展卡尔曼滤波的收敛速度。提出了一种基于序列图像的非合作目标相对导航方法,该方法在不对质心进行估计的情况下首先对非合作目标姿态进行估计,在完成非合作目标姿态估计后再对其质心进行估计。本文推导了光学相机测量值与目标真实姿态的关系,构建了基于序列图像的测量模型,分别建立了不含有非合作目标质心位置的状态方程和基于非合作目标位置、速度矢量的状态方程,设计了适用于非合作目标状态估计的扩展卡尔曼滤波算法。仿真实验表明该方法可在10 Hz采样频率下经过50次采样（即5 s）内快速收敛,从而有利于空间飞行器的在轨服务与维护。     

自适应高阶容积卡尔曼滤波在目标跟踪中的应用

针对传统容积卡尔曼滤波(CKF)在系统状态发生突变时估计精度下降的问题,将强跟踪滤波(STF)算法与高阶容积卡尔曼滤波(HCKF)算法相结合,提出了一种自适应高阶容积卡尔曼滤波(AHCKF)方法。该算法采用高阶球面-相径容积规则,可获得高于传统CKF的估计精度,同时在HCKF算法中引入STF,通过渐消因子在线修正预测误差协方差阵,强迫残差序列正交,提高了算法的鲁棒性,增强了算法应对系统状态突变等不确定因素的能力。将提出的AHCKF算法应用于具有状态突变的机动目标跟踪问题并进行数值仿真,仿真结果表明,AHCKF算法在系统状态发生突变的情况下表现出良好的滤波性能,有效地避免了状态突变造成的滤波精度下降,较传统的CKF、HCKF、交互式多模型-容积滤波(IMM-CKF)和自适应容积卡尔曼滤波(ACKF)算法有更强的鲁棒性和系统自适应能力。     

Adaptive Tracker Field-of-View Variation Via Multiple Model Filtering

Adaptive estimation using multiple model filtering is investigated as a means of changing the field of view as well as the bandwidth of an infrared image tracker when target acceleration can vary over a wide range. The multiple models are created by tuning filters for best performance at differing conditions of exhibited target behavior and differing physical size of their respective fields of view. Probabilistically weighted averaging provides the adaptation mechanism. Each filter involves online identification of the target shape function, so that this algorithm can be used against ill-defined and/or multiple-hot-spot targets. When each individual filter has the form of an enhanced correlator/linear Kalman filter, computational loading is very low. In contrast, an extended Kalman filter processing the raw infrared data directly and assuming a nonlinear constant turn-rate dynamics model provides superior tracking capability, especially for harsh maneuvers, at the cost of a larger computational burden.     

Design of a practical tracking algorithm with radar measurements

The extended Kalman filter (EKF) has been widely used as a nonlinear filtering method for radar tracking problems. However, it has been found that if cross-range measurement errors of the target position are large, the performance of the conventional EKF degrades considerably due to nonnegligible nonlinear effects. A new filtering algorithm for improving the tracking performance with radar measurements is developed based on the fact that correct evaluation of the measurement error covariance is possible in the Cartesian coordinate system. The proposed algorithm may be viewed as a modification of the EKF in which the variance of the range measurement errors is evaluated in an adaptive manner. The filter structure facilitates the incorporation of the sequential measurement processing scheme, and this makes the resulting algorithm favorable to both estimation accuracy and computational efficiency. Computer simulation results show that the proposed method offers superior performance in comparison to previous methods. Moreover, our developed algorithm provides some useful insight into the radar tracking problem     

Track labeling and PHD filter for multitarget tracking

Multiple target tracking requires data association that operates in conjunction with filtering. When multiple targets are closely spaced, the conventional approaches (as, e.g., MHT/assignment) may not give satisfactory results. This is mainly because of the difficulty in deciding what the number of targets is. Recently, the probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter has been proposed and particle filtering techniques have been developed to implement the PHD filter. In the particle PHD filter, the track labeling problem is not considered, i.e., the PHD is obtained only for a frame at a time, and it is very difficult to perform the multipeak extraction, particularly in high clutter environments. A track labeling method combined with the PHD approach, as well as considering the finite resolution, is proposed here for multitarget tracking, i.e., we keep a separate tracker for each target, use the PHD in the resolution cell to get the estimated number and locations of the targets at each time step, and then perform the track labeling ("peak-to-track" association), whose results can provide information for PHD peak extraction at the next time step. Besides, by keeping a separate tracker for each target, our approach provides more information than the standard particle PHD filter. For example, in group target tracking, if we are interested in the motion of a specific target, we can track this target, which is not possible for the standard particle PHD filter, since the standard particle PHD filter does not keep track labels. Using our approach, multitarget tracking can be performed with automatic track initiation, maintenance, spawning, merging, and termination     

The Tracking Index: A Generalized Parameter for ? ? ? and ? ? ? ? Target Trackers

A generalized, optimal filtering solution is presented for the target tracking problem. Applying optimal filtering theory to the target tracking problem, the tracking index, a generalized parameter proportional to the ratio of the position uncertainty due to the target maneuverability to that due to the sensor measurement, is found to have a fundamental role not only in the optimal steady-state solution of the stochastic regulation tracking problem, but also in the track initiation process. Depending on the order of the tracking model, the tracking index solution yields a closed form, consistent set of generalized tracking gains, relationships, and performances. Using the tracking index parameter, an initializing and tracking procedure in recursive form, realizes the accuracy of the Kalman filter with an algorithm as simple as the well-known ? ? ? filter or ? ? ? ? ? filter depending on the tracking order.