留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

开启方式对短舱泄压门性能特性影响

王晨臣 冯诗愚 彭孝天 邓阳 陈俊

王晨臣, 冯诗愚, 彭孝天, 邓阳, 陈俊. 开启方式对短舱泄压门性能特性影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(5): 1069-1075. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.012
引用本文: 王晨臣, 冯诗愚, 彭孝天, 邓阳, 陈俊. 开启方式对短舱泄压门性能特性影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(5): 1069-1075. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.012
Influence of opening mode on performance characteristics of nacelle pressure relief door[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(5): 1069-1075. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.012
Citation: Influence of opening mode on performance characteristics of nacelle pressure relief door[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(5): 1069-1075. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.012

开启方式对短舱泄压门性能特性影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.012
基金项目: 南京航空航天大学研究生创新基地(实验室)开放基金(kfjj20180108); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程基金

Influence of opening mode on performance characteristics of nacelle pressure relief door

  • 摘要: 对不同开启方式下短舱泄压门性能特性进行了数值模拟,并根据NACA TN4007报告中的试验数据验证了数值计算的正确性,在此基础上,研究了在不同马赫数(Ma=0.5,0.7,0.9)和不同压力比(Rp=1.2,1.4,1.6)下开启方式对泄压门排放性能和受力特性的影响。计算结果表明:在一定马赫数下,泄压门排放系数随压力比的增加而增加;而在一定压力比下,泄压门排放系数随马赫数的升高而减小;在开启方式2下泄压门排放系数略优于开启方式1下,由于开启方式1下泄压门平行于来流,因此开启方式1下泄压门推力系数远小于开启方式2下,而泄压门力矩系数高于开启方式2下,约为开启方式2下的2倍。

     

  • [1] 中国民用航空总局.中国民用航空规章第25部运输类飞机适航标准:CAR-25-R3[S].北京:中国民用航空总局,2001.
    [2] VERSEUX O,SOMMERER Y.New challenges for engine nacelle compartments pressure and thermal loads management with aircraft engine evolution[C]∥29th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.Peterburg,Russia:ICAS,2014:501-509.
    [3] RAGHUNATHAN S,BENARD E,WATTERSON J K,et al.Key aerodynamic technologies for aircraft engine nacelles[J].Aeronautical Journal,2006,110(1107):265-288.
    [4] DEWEY P E.A preliminary investigation of aerodynamic characteristics of small inclined air outlets at transonic Mach numbers[R].NACA TN3442,1953.
    [5] DEWEY P E,VICK A R.An investigation of the discharge and drag characteristics of auxiliary-air outlets discharging into a transonic stream[R].NACA TN3466,1955.
    [6] VICK A R.An investigation of discharge and thrust characteristics of flapped outlets for stream Mach numbers from 0.40 to 1.30[R].NACA TN4007,1957.
    [7] PRATT P R,WATTERSON J K,BENARD E.Computational and experimental studies of pressure relief doors in ventilated nacelle compartments[J].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,2003,28(10):1678-86.
    [8] PRATT P R,WATTERSON J K,BENARD E,et al.Performance of a flapped duct exhausting into a compressible external flow[R].Yokohama,Japan:24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences,ICAS2004-04.2.R.2,2004.
    [9] BENARD E,WATTERSON J K,GAULT R,et al.Review and experimental survey of flapped exhaust performance[J].Journal of Aircraft,2008,45(1):349-352.
    [10] VEDESHKIN G,DUBOVITSKIY A,BONDARENKO D,et al.Experimental investigations of hydraulic devices performance in aviation engine compartment[R].Brisbane,Australia:28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences,ICAS2012-P2.10,2012.
    [11] SCHOTT T.Computational analysis of aircraft pressure relief doors[D].Colorado:Colorado State University,2016.
    [12] ABEEL P C.Access and pressure release door latch mechanism:US3571977[P].1971-03-23.
    [13] TOUHIMAA C R,PAISH S D.Aircraft pressure management system:WO,WO 2009/042322 A1[P].2009-04-02.
    [14] SIEMS R J,VOORHEES A B.Blow-out safe aircraft doors:US2748855[P].1956-06-05.
    [15] JENSEN D T,BALZER R L.Flow control apparatus for gas turbine engine installation pressure relief doors:US5704207[P].1998-01-06.
    [16] PEARSON K A,MOORHOUSEM D.Pressure relief panel for aircraft powerplant:US4232513[P].1980-11-11.
    [17] MICHAEL A E,JONES M D,DUNSTAN KW.Spring loaded pressure relief door:US2012/0125010 A1[P].2012-05-24.
    [18] BUBELLO R,REAM J L.Ventilation system for a nacelle:US4825644[P].1989-05-02.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  547
  • HTML浏览量:  5
  • PDF量:  433
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-10-02
  • 刊出日期:  2019-05-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回