不同钝体宽度下的驻涡燃烧室排放试验

吴泽俊; 何小民; 金义; 宋耀宇; 洪亮; 薛冲

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.01.023

不同钝体宽度下的驻涡燃烧室排放试验

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.01.023

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室, 南京 210016

基金项目:

江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(CXLX12_0167)

详细信息

作者简介:
吴泽俊(1984-),男,湖北恩施人,博士生,主要从事燃烧理论与燃烧室技术研究.E-mail:wzj@nuaa.edu.cn

中图分类号: V231.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 1013
- HTML浏览量: 4
- PDF量: 478
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-05-13
- 刊出日期: 2016-01-28

Experiment on emissions of a trapped vortex combustor with different bluff body widths

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究空气流量分配对驻涡燃烧室对排放特性的影响,了解对驻涡燃烧室内污染物生成的过程及其影响因素,设计了一个能够改变中心钝体宽度、仅凹腔供油的驻涡燃烧室.在常压下对该驻涡燃烧室进行了排放特性试验,进口温度保持200℃.试验中,燃烧室进口马赫数为0.15~0.3.影响排放的因素主要包括雾化质量、凹腔当量比以及与进口马赫数相关的驻留时间等.总体来说雾化质量、凹腔当量比的提高对降低CO和HC的排放是有利的,但是这会使NOx排放增加.在低凹腔当量比时,CO排放曲线变化下降比较平缓,甚至出现上升趋势,而HC排放曲线比较陡峭.这是由于HC的消耗速度比CO消耗速度快,随着凹腔当量比的增加,供油压力提高,燃油雾化粒径变小,燃油蒸发时间缩短,使HC排放快速减少,中间产物CO大量产生而来不及消耗.凹腔当量比进一步上升时,由于燃烧温度的提高,使得CO排放快速减少.在燃烧室内燃烧过程中,NOx的形成和消耗是非常复杂的过程,目前只能作一些定性的分析,而CO和HC的反应过程相对简单.通过对不同钝体槽宽下,具有相似凹腔前壁流量的工况的比较,发现CO和HC的形成主要受凹腔内工作状况影响,而NOx的形成过程更复杂,主流也对其产生着重要的影响.
- 驻涡燃烧室 /
- 排放 /
- 空气流量分配 /
- 雾化特性 /
- 湍流强度 /
- 驻留时间
Abstract: To reveal the effects of air flow-rate distribution on emission characteristics of trapped vortex combustor and understand the generating processes of emissions as well as the factors affecting the processes, a trapped vortex combustor with different centric bluff body width was designed. And the combustor was designed to be fueled only in cavity. Emission experiment was conducted at atmospheric pressure. And inlet temperature of the combustor was kept at 200℃. Inlet Mach number varied from 0.15 to 0.3.Atomization quality, cavity equivalence ratio in combustion zone, and inlet Mach number and residence time influenced emissions in combustors. Generally, improvement of atomization quality and increase of cavity equivalence ratio can enhance combustion process and consequently reduce emissions of CO and HC. However, it will also lead to increase of NOx emission. As cavity equivalence ratio is relatively lower, CO emission curves decline gradually, and even ascend in some cases. HC emission curves descend rapidly here. This is mainly because the consumption of HC is much faster than CO. When cavity equivalence ratio is increasing, the fueling pressure is elevated and thus atomization is enhanced, so vaporizing time of fuel spray is shortened. This will result in rapid decline of HC emission. Although, a large amount of CO will be produced and there is no enough time to consume. CO emission declines rapidly when cavity equivalence ratio is high enough because of the higher temperature in the combustion zones. In gas turbine combustors, the producing and consuming process of NOx is very complicated, and there is no enough data to demonstrate it. Comparison between different bluff body widths has been made as the cavity air flow-rate on front wall are similar. And it reveals that the emissions of CO and HC are mainly determined by the cavity condition. However, NOx emission is also impacted by the mainstream.
- trapped vortex combustor /
- emissions /
- air flow rate distribution /
- atomizing characteristic /
- turbulence intensity /
- residence time

HTML

参考文献(21)

[1]	林宇震,许全宏,刘高恩.燃气轮机燃烧室[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2008.
[2]	Mongia H C.Aero-thermal design and analysis of gas turbine combustion systems:current status and future direction[R].AIAA 98-3982,1998.
[3]	Sturgess G J,Zelin J,Shouse D T,et al.Emissions reduction technologies for military gas turbine engines[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2005,21(2):193-217.
[4]	Al-Attab K A,Zainal Z A.Design and performance of a pressurized cyclone combustor (PCC) for high and low heating value gas combustion[J].Applied Energy,2011,88(2):1084-1095.
[5]	Hwang C H,Lee S,Kim J H,et al.An experimental study on flame stability and pollutant emission in a cyclone jet hybrid combustor[J].Applied Energy,2009,86(7/8):1154-1161.
[6]	Gupta A K.Gas turbine combustion:prospects and challenges[J].Energy Conversion and Management,1997,38(10/11/12/13):1311-1318.
[7]	Van Erp C A,Richman M H.Technical challenges associated with the development of advanced combustion systems[R].Lisbon,Portugal:Symposium on Gas Turbine Engine Combustion,Emissions and Alternative Fuels,1998.
[8]	Abbe N T,Randall R F,Howard L W.Atmospheric effects of aviation:first report of the subsonic assessment project[R].NASA-RP1385,1996.
[9]	International Civil Aviation Organization.International standards and recommended practices annex 16 to the convention on international civil aviation environmental protection volume Ⅱ:aircraft engine emissions[M].3nd ed.Montreal,Canada:International Civil Avation Organization,1993.
[10]	International Civil Avation Organization.Report of the independent experts to CAEP8 on the second NOx review & long term technology goals[R].Committee on Aviation Environmented protection,CAEP/8-WP/10,2010.
[11]	Roquemore W M,Shouse D,Burrus D,et al.Trapped vortex combustor concept for gas turbine engines[R].AIAA-2001-0483,2001.
[12]	Hsu K Y,Goss L P,Trump D D.Performance of a trapped-vortex combustor[R].AIAA 95-0810,1995.
[13]	Hsu K Y,Goss L P,Roquemore W M.Characteristics of a trapped-vortex combustor[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,1998,14(1):57-65.
[14]	Shouse D T.Trapped vortex combustion technology[EB/OL].[2013-12-05] http://soliton.ae.gatech.edu/ people/lsankar/MITE_Workshop_2000/presentations/Shouse.pdf.
[15]	Straub D L,Casleton K H,Lewis R E,et al.Assessment of rich-burn,quick-mix,lean-burn trapped vortex combustor for stationary gas turbines[J].Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2005,127(1):36-41.
[16]	Bucher J,Edmonds R G,Steele R C,et al.The development of a lean-premixed trapped vortex combustor[R].ASME Paper GT2003-38236,2003.
[17]	Edmonds R G, Steele R C,Williams J T,et al.Ultra-low NOx advanced vortex combustor[R].ASME Paper GT2006-90319, 2006.
[18]	金义,何小民,蒋波.富油燃烧/快速淬熄/贫油燃烧(RQL)工作模式下驻涡燃烧室排放性能试验[J].航空动力学报,2011,26(5):1031-1036. JIN Yi,HE Xiaomin,JIANG Bo.Experimental study on emission performance of rich-burn quick-quench lean-burn (RQL) trapped-vortex combustor[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2011,26(5):1031-1036.(in Chinese)
[19]	JIN Yi,HE Xiaomin,ZHANG Jinyu,et al.Experimental study on emission performance of an LPP/TVC[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2012,25(3):335-341.
[20]	蒋波.RQL驻涡燃烧室排放性能研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2010. JIANG Bo.An investigation on emmission performance of RQL trapped vortex combustor[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2010.(in Chinese)
[21]	田中礼.LPP驻涡燃烧室排放性能研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2010. TIAN Zhongli.An investigation on emission performance of LPP trapped vortex combustor[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2010.(in Chinese)